[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?

Ronald Van Putte vanputter at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 09:20:10 AKST 2017


Come on now!  How can hobby shops make some $$$ on a customer who needs to “buy some lightness” if the weight limit is thrown in the trash?

I hope that all readers realize that my tongue was firmly in my cheek when I posted the above.  There is no advantage in R/C aerobatic competition for a pilot to fly a heavy airplane.

Ron Van Putte

> On Jan 25, 2017, at 10:58 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> I think its time to throw the weight limit in the trash.  There is nothing keeping anyone from voluntarily spending half of a paycheck to drop a few grams.
>  
> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] On Behalf Of blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 10:56
> To: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com <mailto:jlachow at hotmail.com>>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle?
>  
> +1
> 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion 
> Sent: Jan 24, 2017 5:04 PM 
> To: General pattern discussion 
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposal Cycle? 
> 
> 
> Does anyone know when the next rules proposal cycle begins?
> 
>  
> 
> I think it is time to stretch the weight limit to at least 4 ozs over 11 lbs. for electrics in ALL the AMA classes. Tired of paying the proverbial  $100 and ounce to get there. Glow setups have an advantage. No doubt in my mind.
> 
>  
> 
> Flame on.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170125/e9154403/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list