[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[Ed Alt]

Hmmm.  I've got to think on that a while.  Might eventually make sense!


Ed


________________________________
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Earl Haury via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 4:04 PM
To: S. McNickle; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

I’m for a 2% bonus for every year over 70!

Earl

From: S. McNickle via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 2:56 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

As Mike Murphy points out, rules intended to even the playing field often have unintended consequences.  Indy racing fans may remember when there was a special rule for 'stock block' engines to encourage development of cheaper engines... until Team Penske developed, at great cost,a stock block that met all the rules and blew everybody away.

Might be possible to find the right number, but I think it will be tough.

________________________________
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170224/ebbe0c16/attachment.html>