[NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposals

W Anthony Abdullah aabdu at sbcglobal.net
Fri Feb 24 05:45:04 AKST 2017


In that case the punishment is not for having a "legal" wingspan, but for having an overweight plane. At least that's how I understood it.



Sent from my iPad

On Feb 24, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Keith Hoard via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Because rules, Randy.
>  
> Sent from my Windows 10 phone
>  
> From: Randy Forbus via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 6:35
> To: ronlock at comcast.net; General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposals
>  
> 
> Im not sure I agree with a penalty, because why do you have to punish a person who has a 2 meter plane.
> 
> From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of ronlock--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 1:32 PM
> To: Anthony Romano; General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules proposals
>  
> I support these ideas.   It could be the specific numbers would need adjustment as we get experience with them..
> Our noise rule specifies a percent handicap and works well.
> Ron Lockhart
>> 
>> On February 24, 2017 at 7:09 AM Anthony Romano via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>   After all of the perpetual comments on the list about the weight limit and other technical rules why not change these to a score penalty instead of disqualification? This way if comes to an event with an overweight or oversize or loud airplane they get a 2% score penalty and aren't told to go home.
>> The other big complaint is the perceived intimidation factor of flying smaller airplanes. In an effort to reduce that anxiety I am thinking about proposing a bonus to raw scores for Sportsman and Intermediate based on wing span. Planes with a span under 55" would receive a 4% bonus and under span 65" would receive a 2% bonus. It should be possible to input this during registration to automate the process. 
>> 
>> The numbers I have picked are somewhat arbitrary but the idea is people can show up with a variety of aircraft and either be rewarded for trying in the entry classes or compete without the expense and effort of complying to the comply to the current standards.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Anthony
>> 
> 
>  
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170224/181b41b2/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list