[NSRCA-discussion] Judging

[Vicente Bortone]

Hi Don,

75 degree roll is more than expected for a correction due to turbulence.
Therefore, clearly it has been done by the pilot and cannot be interpreted
as a correction due to turbulence that is the only one allowed in the
rulebook.  Therefore, the option No1 appears the best option since the
pilot introduced an element that was not suppose to be there.

Best,


Vicente "Vince" Bortone

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Another judging question:
>
>
>
> Senario:  An upline is flown that requires no rolls.  The pilot executes a
> partial roll that turns about 75 degrees then immediately returns to
> vertical as specified in the maneuver description.
>
>
>
> Two choices seem to be available:
>
> 1.        0 the maneuver because 2 turns have been made that require 5 pt
> downgrade each.  Errors are initial roll and roll that returns the mode to
> the correct attitude.
>
> 2.        Score it a 5 because only one error was made and a correction
> was made to return the model to the correct attitude.  Do not downgrade the
> correction.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20170807/736dd179/attachment.html>