[NSRCA-discussion] Competition

[W Anthony Abdullah]

That I would agree with. It's like watching a plane fly a simple loop, vs. watching the same loop with an explanation of downgrades like, wings not level, entry and exit altitude changes, and overall roundness. It's that understanding that increases the respect and interest in said maneuver.

That fact notwithstanding, pattern still is not a big spectator sport. It just takes a special sort of person to appreciate it. Most people have the same response my nephew has... Whatever...

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 19, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Peter Vogel via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> >However, in terms of spectator interest, I would say our patterns are analogous to the compulsories in figure skating.
> >  I have thought about that before.  Other than the skater falling over, I would have no idea how to judge skating.  Same > for most folks watching us fly.
> 
> Having watched televised compulsories back in the 80's, the key is the commentary.  Helping people to understand what they are watching for and to build a mental "relationship" with the competitors so they feel the same highs and lows as the competitor does during the flight.  
> 
> That's why I think we need to do a Demo video of a world class competition, with expert commentary and color commentary from someone familiar with (but not necessarily at the world class judging level).  Then market that demo with ESPN, etc. and get it out there virally on YouTube.
> 
> At our annual airshow we do a live demo of precision aerobatics with me doing the commentary around the maneuvers to be flown -- it's one of the most popular demos (right next to turbines) and gets great feedback from an audience of over 1000.
> 
> Peter+
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Phil via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> Not the "Compulsories", Ed...
>> 
>> They do figures that are required, and are judged on a 10-point scale.
>> 
>> However, in terms of spectator interest, I would say our patterns are analogous to the compulsories in figure skating.  I have thought about that before.  Other than the skater falling over, I would have no idea how to judge skating.  Same for most folks watching us fly.
>> 
>> Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus
>> AMA 1294, Scientific Leader Member
>> SPA L-18, Board Member
>> Oliver Springs, TN  (865) 435-1476v  (865) 604-0541c
>> 
>> 
>> I was speaking in terms of how exciting it is to watch, not the "performance" itself.  Figure skating is closer to IMAC freestyle.
>> 
>> On Sep 19, 2016, at 10:28 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
> Associate Vice President, Academy of Model Aeronautics District X
> Treasurer, National Society of Radio Control Aerobatics (NSRCA)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20160919/856b47d8/attachment.html>