[NSRCA-discussion] Sportsman

[W Anthony Abdullah]

John,
Suggesting pre turn around maneuvers is not congruent with increased noise. I'm sure we could apply some of what we have learned in the last 20 years to address the noise concern. I could do an electric set up as fast as any tipo ever was. Furthermore I don't know if it is necessary to demand flying a non turnaround sequence with a modern airplane. My electric Integral can quietly fly the same sequence.

Sent from my iPad

On Nov 5, 2016, at 12:36 PM, John Pavlick via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> Guys don’t get me wrong – I LOVE the pre-turnaround planes. In fact I flew a Junior Kaos in Sportsman when I got started in Pattern. The thing is – I was always under the belief that the pre-turnaround schedules and tuned pipe-with-retracts ships almost put an end to Pattern – because of the noise and amount of space required to have a contest. The answer to this problem was the pregnant guppy airplanes and turnaround schedules. That fixed everything. Things have gotten worse as far as noise tolerance goes so why is it all of a sudden OK to have a pre-turnaround “event” at the NAT’s? Just wondering… J
>  
> John Pavlick
> Cell: 203-417-4971
>  
> <image001.png>
> Integrated Development Services
>  
>  
>  
> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Don Szczur via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2016 8:31 AM
> To: wayg2013 at gmail.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Sportsman
>  
> I'm in for a classic event.  We'll find some room for a Phoenix 7 between the 2M's.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wayg2013 via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Fri, Nov 4, 2016 8:37 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Sportsman
> 
> With as much room as they will have  there on that runway how about asking the SPA guys... and making it a grand pattern event.... id bring my Intruder.... maybe a 2 meter plane... lol. 
>  
>  
> Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S7, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>  
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: 11/4/16 7:02 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Sportsman
>  
> John,
>  
> That has DEFINITELY been put out there by myself and others. There are supporters of this. 
>  
> Scott
> 
> On Friday, November 4, 2016, John Fuqua via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> We know that Sportsman is a provisional event for AMA and is therefore not “offered” at the NATS.    I suggest that NSRCA fully sponsor Sportsman at the Blytheville Nats.     Maybe this will help up the attendance and help up the enthusiasm.    
> John Fuqua
>  
> 
> 
> --
> Scott A. McHarg
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
> Texas A&M University
> PPL - ASEL
> Remote Pilot Certified Under FAA Part 107
>  
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20161106/34589654/attachment.html>