[NSRCA-discussion] 2017 NATS

Atwood, Mark atwoodm at paragon-inc.com
Fri Nov 4 07:53:09 AKDT 2016


+1



MARK ATWOOD
o.  (440) 229-2502
c.  (216) 316-2489
e.  atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>

Paragon Consulting, Inc.
5900 Landerbrook Drive, Suite 205, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
www.paragon-inc.com<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>

<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
Powering The Digital Experience

On Nov 4, 2016, at 11:35 AM, Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:

I'd like to remind everyone that is upset with the direction that the NSRCA is taking and thinks that we aren't trying to promote pattern that the positions for the Executive board are now open for candidates.  It'd be nice to get back to having to actually decide which candidate would be best for the position instead of only having one choice.   I am very pleased with this BoD.  Every waking moment and every discussion is what can we do to make pattern strong again.

I agree 100% with Jeff, Keith and John Fuqua.

Scott A. McHarg
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL
Remote Pilot Certified Under FAA Part 107

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Keith Black via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
Very puzzling response Joe. Can you explain "why" this is a bad idea and is counterproductive to growing pattern?

And assuming that it has no growth impact, "why" is it such a terrible thing to allow NATS move around the country every two years?

Virtual every sport I'm familiar with (professional and amateur) travels their Nationals or World competition.

Confused,
Keith Black


On Friday, November 4, 2016, Joe Lachowski via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:


I am disappointed in the direction the NSRCA has been going the last 5 years. Instead of focusing on growing participation in pattern as their primary goal it has done things like making sequences more and more difficult and now having alternate venues for the NATS. So tell me how having alternate venues for the NATS grows pattern? Answer is absolutely nothing. It just wastes financial assets. This idea too, will die. Do you honestly think others in the various regions of the country will put in the effort on a regular basis to have a NATS in their region?


I am done with the NSRCA. I've been a member since the late 80's. My contribution to the event as a CD over 25 years and long time sequence committee member has become a waste of my precious time.  My membership will permanently lapse this time around. I can no longer support an organization that is directionally lost. And you wonder why most of District 2 has left the NSRCA?


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20161104/4bc85af0/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list