[NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences

[Scott McHarg]

At $50 per protest, that's a lot of change and I'm glad you have a great
job.  Again, you may want to reconsider and start your two year cycle plan
in 2016.  It's because I care.

*Scott A. McHarg*
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com> wrote:

> Those will all be “protest” Zeroes . . .
>
>
>
> -Keith Hoard
>
> -klhoard at outlook.com
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott McHarg [mailto:scmcharg at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:32
> *To:* Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com>
> *Cc:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences
>
>
>
> That's a lot of zeroed maneuvers beginning 1.1.16.  You may want to
> reconsider.
>
>
> *Scott A. McHarg*
>
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>
> Texas A&M University
>
> PPL - ASEL
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com> wrote:
>
> I’m staying on the two-year cycle.
>
>
>
> -Keith Hoard
>
> -klhoard at outlook.com
>
>
>
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]
> *On Behalf Of *Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:27
> *To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences
>
>
>
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> We just wanted to let you know that the proposed 2016-2017 Advanced and
> Masters sequences have been voted on and approved as submitted by the
> Sequence Development Committee.  The sequences passed unanimously by your
> Board of Directors.  We will have them shown on the website as official
> soon.  The Sequence Committee will be working on the Aresti and have them
> available soon as well.
>
>
>
> In the BoD meeting, it was brought up as to why the committee chose to
> remove the option in Masters of 1/2 rolls on the Top Hat and make it a
> forced cross-box maneuver.  The committee felt (and I believe but not
> positive that it's in the Sequence Development Guide) that the sequence
> should have a forced cross-box maneuver.  Since the Humpty has options, it
> is not forced and why the option was taken out of the Top Hat.
>
>
>
> Anyways, the purpose of this email is purely informational and not meant
> to start a discussion on the why's.  The good news is that the sequences
> are approved.  Good luck to all!
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Scott McHarg
>
>
>
>
>
> *Scott A. McHarg*
>
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>
> Texas A&M University
>
> PPL - ASEL
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150910/25652525/attachment.html>