[NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences

[Keith Hoard]

Those will all be “protest” Zeroes . . . 

 

-Keith Hoard

-klhoard at outlook.com

 

From: Scott McHarg [mailto:scmcharg at gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:32
To: Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com>
Cc: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences

 

That's a lot of zeroed maneuvers beginning 1.1.16.  You may want to reconsider.




Scott A. McHarg

VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot

Texas A&M University

PPL - ASEL

 

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Keith Hoard <klhoard at outlook.com <mailto:klhoard at outlook.com> > wrote:

I’m staying on the two-year cycle.

 

-Keith Hoard

-klhoard at outlook.com <mailto:klhoard at outlook.com> 

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> ] On Behalf Of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:27
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters Sequences

 

Good Morning,

 

We just wanted to let you know that the proposed 2016-2017 Advanced and Masters sequences have been voted on and approved as submitted by the Sequence Development Committee.  The sequences passed unanimously by your Board of Directors.  We will have them shown on the website as official soon.  The Sequence Committee will be working on the Aresti and have them available soon as well.

 

In the BoD meeting, it was brought up as to why the committee chose to remove the option in Masters of 1/2 rolls on the Top Hat and make it a forced cross-box maneuver.  The committee felt (and I believe but not positive that it's in the Sequence Development Guide) that the sequence should have a forced cross-box maneuver.  Since the Humpty has options, it is not forced and why the option was taken out of the Top Hat.

 

Anyways, the purpose of this email is purely informational and not meant to start a discussion on the why's.  The good news is that the sequences are approved.  Good luck to all!

 

Best Regards,

Scott McHarg

 

 

Scott A. McHarg

VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot

Texas A&M University

PPL - ASEL

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150910/894f4e0c/attachment.html>