[NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters

[Herb Kurlan]

The committee knows that they can add in the option to do an in line turnaround coming in or going out. They just are required to include 1 or 2 turnarounds with the only option to go cross box. They chose to make this turnaround the one with out the option to go in line. The current masters sequence has two cross box turnarounds without the in line option. 
Herb

-------- Original message --------
From: blotch44026--- via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Date: 09/04/2015  3:45 PM  (GMT-08:00) 
To: Dan Underkofler <underdw at gmail.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters 

The option for the inline maneuver on the tophat was fine, it just needs to be changed to a full roll or no roll on the up-line allowing you to move towards center as opposed to away from it. Moving away was the impracticality of it. Its a nice option as it allows you to hold position if you want or change position if you want by doing the cross-box, traditional tophat. Not sure why you would want to remove the inline option completely when a simple fix makes it very useful and practical. 

Rick Sweeney
   


-----Original Message-----
>From: Dan Underkofler via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Sep 4, 2015 4:44 PM
>To: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2016/17 Advanced and Masters
>
>+1!!!!!
>
>
>
>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:02 PM, Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>> 
>> PLEASE put the inline option back in the tophat. There IS enough room to do it if you keep the cobra at a reasonable size.  There is no good reason to take it out.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2015 11:35 AM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> The Sequence Committee considered all input from the membership recieved since we sent out our recommendation last spring. We have decided to leave Advanced proposal as is, but made some changes to Masters. Both are posted to the web site. The Masters changes are as follows all based on membership input: 
>>> 
>>> 1. The two down wind stall turns #9 and #13 were very similar in design. We modified the second one (#13), to a Stall Turn with a 3/4 roll, 1/4 roll down. 
>>> 2. The Top Hat turnaround, #15 had an inline option which was not practical. Since we did not have any forced cross box turnaround (only optional) we decided to make to eliminate the in line option. It is now a Top Hat with 3 of 4 up, 1/4 roll down. 
>>> 3. We have dropped the requirement for immediate roll reversal. All roll reversals may have a pause, BUT it is not required. Anyone wishing to do immediate reversal, like FAI, may do so. This has been in our sequence descriptions  for the past few years, so no change. 
>>> 
>>> The BOD will be voting on these sequences next week. If approved, we will soon create the Aresti and Power Point for both of these. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks, 
>>> 
>>> Dale 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150904/6fe95cec/attachment.html>