[NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
Ronald Van Putte
vanputter at gmail.com
Thu Sep 3 05:50:40 AKDT 2015
I had the same experience with the violin and rotator cuff surgery. My shoulder healed, but I still can’t play the violin.
Ron
> On Sep 3, 2015, at 8:22 AM, Phil Spelt via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Wow. RVP -- thanks!!! With help like that, I'll be winning FAI by next spring. Look out, pilots!!!
>
> It is like when I had lip surgery. I asked the surgeon how soon I could play the trumpet. She said to let it heal for aobut 6 months and I should be good t oplay. I said thaty's great. 'cause I can't play trumpet now. Ba-Da-boom...
>
>
> From: "Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 9:31:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
> No, that would be silly! However, the pilot has to don special goggles so it looks like the airplane is under the water.
>
> Glad to be of assistance.
>
> Ron
>
> On Sep 2, 2015, at 7:26 PM, Phil Spelt via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
>
> Guys, I am really new to pattern. Does the goldfish have to be done under water? Else, how would the goldfish live???
>
> Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Secretary
> AMA 1294, Scientific Leader Member
> SPA L-18, Board Member
> (865) 435-1476v (865) 604-0541c
> From: "Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> To: "DaveL322" <DaveL322 at comcast.net <mailto:DaveL322 at comcast.net>>, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 2, 2015 3:28:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
> Sure descriptive names like Comet and Bunt and clown dance and now Big M and eyecatcher. All really describe the maneuver :)
> 2/3 (or 3/4) cuban eight or reverse cuban eight wasn't catchy enough.
> Sequence committee; Lets call it a goldfish.
> FAI Sequence committee: No that's an American name let's call it a comet. Now thats cool!!
>
> For those that don't know my sense of humor insert tongue in cheek emoticon :-J
>
> Stuart
>
>
>
> On 9/2/2015 3:16 PM, DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion wrote:
> Exactly.
>
> A roll is a roll.
>
> A loop is a loop.
>
> A square loop with half rollS has multiple rollS just like a top hat with half rollS.
>
> Changing the name of the maneuver would make it consistent other maneuvers and, consistent with the maneuver description.
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave
>
> Please pardon any spelling errors or brevity.....Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: James Hiller via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: 09/02/2015 2:32 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: 'Don Ramsey' <donramsey at gmail.com> <mailto:donramsey at gmail.com>, 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
> It's been called that for 30+ years. Eliminating "Roll" in the description makes works for me.
>
> From - Cobra Roll, 4 of 8 point rolls on 45 degree lines (U):
>
> To - Cobra, with 4 of 8 point rolls on 45 degree lines (U):
>
> Jim
>
>
> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] On Behalf Of Don Ramsey via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 11:17 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
>
> BTW, why is Masters maneuver 17 call a “Cobra Roll” anyway? It has nothing to do with a roll. A better name might be “Cobra”.
>
>
>
> From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org>] On Behalf Of DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion
> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 8:52 AM
> To: Jon Lowe; General pattern discussion; Stuart Chale
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
>
> "Loop" equals 360 degrees. Would not "roll" also equal 360 degrees?
>
>
> In AMA, 2 point roll, 4 point roll, and 8 point roll all convey a full rotation with no change in direction.
>
>
> Unless AMA adopts the FAI style of describing rolls, it seems a roll should be a roll?
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dave
>
>
> Please pardon any spelling errors or brevity.....Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
> Date: 09/02/2015 9:35 AM (GMT-05:00)
> To: NSRCA <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>, Stuart Chale <schale1 at outlook.com <mailto:schale1 at outlook.com>>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Cobra rolls
>
> Just looked at the maneuver description, and it doesn't specify roll direction.
>
> Jon Lowe
>
> On Sep 2, 2015 8:04 AM, Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Is there a specified direction to the second portion of a cobra roll.
> > Roll in same direction as first half of the maneuver or is it pilots choice.
> > M17 has a Cobra roll with 4 of 8 on each half.
> > Thanks,
> > Stuart
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150903/9471e376/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list