[NSRCA-discussion] Arming plug and Failsafe

[ronlock at comcast.net]

+2 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Dave Lockhart via NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
To: "Jas" <justanotherflyr at gmail.com>, "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:56:38 AM 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming plug and Failsafe 



+1 




From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Jas via NSRCA-discussion 
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:26 AM 
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Arming plug and Failsafe 





Nice idea, light weight and probably easy to do. 

Sent from my iP 





On May 19, 2015, at 10:49 AM, Rudy via NSRCA-discussion < nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org > wrote: 





All this rhetoric is making us aware of electrical safety issues in pattern flying. That’s good in itself whether you use an arming device or use a switch on your radio. Redundant systems: arming and radio switch are safer still. They both work when used. 



Someone mentioned how can you tell if the plan is energized. Hmm, how about an LED light at the top of the plan just behind the canopy that is lit when the system is energized. Oh my, that’s another worm for the cam. 



¿Por Qué No? 







<blockquote>



_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

</blockquote>


_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150519/87760f01/attachment.html>