[NSRCA-discussion] FW: Matt Finley ( Arming Plug )
Anthony Romano
anthonyr105 at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 23 12:32:11 AKST 2015
From: anthonyr105 at hotmail.com
To: wayg2013 at gmail.com; davel322 at comcast.net
Subject: RE: [NSRCA-discussion] Matt Finley ( Arming Plug )
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 16:30:41 -0500
Neither an arming plug or Failsafe would have helped that situation. We can't legislate for every failure mode. Conscientious participants will be the best solution.
Anthony
To: DaveL322 at comcast.net; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 15:25:09 -0600
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Matt Finley ( Arming Plug )
From: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Saw it last year where the contest was frustrated and walk of the flight
line before plane was retrieved.
He inadvertently hit the throttle and plane went airborne...for a few
seconds and crashed in on the other side of runway fortunately.
Point is it doesn’t matter how well the system is
armed/disarmed stuff can happen. It takes a level head and common sense to
prevail.
Dave, point well state on the startup up of
IC’s. Has happened to me when throttle was nearly wide open.
Thankfully I still have all my digits.
Smooth FLying...
Wayne
From: DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 11:05 AM
To: Budd Engineering ; General pattern discussion ;
Matthew Finley
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Matt Finley ( Arming Plug
)
How many runaways have happened with electrics at pattern contests?
Since maybe 2008 when substantial numbers of electrics were being used?
Personally, I have never seen one.
How many IC engines have I seen inadvertently started at half or full
throttle since 2008? I have personally seen several.
Have there been instances of of arming plugs and wiring fail?
Yes.
A lot of things could go wrong resulting in a potential safety hazard with
IC or electric patterns planes. Having a safe procedure and sticking to it
100% is the issue.....accidents happens when procedures are not followed.
Arming plugs themselves do not make electrics safe....they do introduce another
failure point.
Regards,
Dave
Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3
-------- Original message --------
From: Budd Engineering via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date:02/23/2015 11:50 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Matthew Finley <rcfin02 at msn.com>, General pattern discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Matt Finley ( Arming Plug )
At nearly every contest I've attended since I started flying electric in
pattern (the 2004 Nats in Masters) I've seen at least one occurrence where
someone retrieved a plane without removing an arming plug first. Usually
the pilot reminds the person to do it while they're carrying the plane back or
as they're setting it down somewhere. It happens with my planes too and I
make sure they switch the receiver off and then I remove my canopy and
disconnect the battery directly. But before they even get that far I've
taken the other steps to make sure there's virtually no chance the motor is
going to run.
My point is this. A layered approach is the only way I've found to
effectively mitigate this particular risk to the levels of safety that you
claim. Relying on someone to remove an arming plug is not a complete
panacea and may lend a false sense of security that the motor system has been
de-energized, when in fact it may not have been. There's many ways to
manage the risk to the desired level, the use of an arming plug is one, and may
not necessarily be the best.
Jerry
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 23, 2015, at 5:29 AM, Matthew Finley via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
wrote:
I use the Ultra Deans stlye Arming Plug from F3A Unlimited,
and It works very well. I would gather it provides you with a 99 % dagree of
confidence that your caller , plane carrier , yourself, or anyone else will
not be harmed. Yes... I do agree that there is a miniscuel chance that a pilot
/ caller could forget to unplug the safety, however I feel most pilots that
have been doing it a while is like tying your shoes, or etc.... On all of my
electrics except for indoor ships, I have some sort of disconnect. I for one
would like to see it an inforced rule at all sanctioned meets not just pattern
meets, that any plane over a certain size or weight must have one in order to
fly. Just my three pennies
Matthew E.
Finley
QCI - Technology Assistant
614-557-3846 Mobile
mfinley at quadcityinnovations.com
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion
mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150223/bef03983/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list