[NSRCA-discussion] Worlds

[rcmaster199 at aol.com]

Dave is weight checked after every Prelim flight as well or only Semi and Final? I forget..
 
A couple grams isn't much. But it's the rule, to belabor the obvious.
 
BTW-Congrats on your fine Nats showing...
Matt
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: DaveL322 via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
To: Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com>; General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>; Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
Sent: Fri, Aug 14, 2015 10:15 am
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds


  
Could have been 5049 every prior flight. 
 
  
 
 
Weight can increase in humid conditions...especially if flying in the rain. 
 
  
 
 
Wood and foam tires can absorb a lot of water. 
 
  
 
 
  
Regards,  
  
   
  
  
Dave  
  
   
  
  
Please pardon any spelling errors or brevity.....Sent on a Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note® 3  
 
 
 
-------- Original message -------- 
From: Randy Forbus via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
Date: 08/14/2015 10:04 AM (GMT-05:00)  
To: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds  
 
That's what I was thinking, doesn't make since that he fail a weight check now 
 
________________________________________ 
From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:58 PM 
To: NSRCA; Daniel Dupont 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds 
 
There is a whole procedure they have to go thru if they initially fail, including using a second scale. That could take time. Let's hope he ultimately is OK.  Kind of weird that now he would fail, this late in the game. 
 
On Aug 14, 2015 8:50 AM, Daniel Dupont via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote: 
> 
> +1 
> 
> He’s in 11 positon now the score board still doesn’t show the flight has zero, I hope he’s ok, a hell of a ride. 
> 
> Daniel on MacBook Pro 
> 
> From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Reply-To: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>, General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Date: Friday, August 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM 
> To: Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com> 
> Cc: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds 
> 
> IF the information is true, he only failed by 2 grams.  FAI is 5000 plus 50 for inconsistencies.  My understanding is he was spot checked and failed with the particular batteries that were chosen for the flight.  This is one time I hope that my information is just dead wrong. 
> 
> Scott A. McHarg 
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot 
> Texas A&M University 
> PPL - ASEL 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com> wrote: 
>> 
>> How can he fail to make weight, wasn't he weighed before, what did he add to the plane to give it 52g 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ________________________________ 
>> From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on behalf of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
>> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:29 PM 
>> To: General pattern discussion 
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds 
>> 
>> Houston, looks like we have a problem.  Joseph put in some decent flights today but I've heard that he failed weight on Site 1 at 5052 g.  If that's true, his flight will be disqualified and probably knock him out of the top 10 as that was his better flight.  Joseph has worked his butt off.  What a crappy way to not make it. 
>> 
>> Either way, he has done and will continue to do a great job!  He has impressed me the most and has come so very far in a short time.  Don, please tell the boy we are all very proud! 
>> 
>> 
>> Scott A. McHarg 
>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot 
>> Texas A&M University 
>> PPL - ASEL 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 
_______________________________________________ 
NSRCA-discussion mailing list 
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing
list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150814/81332142/attachment.html>