[NSRCA-discussion] Worlds

[Daniel Dupont]

Probably using bigger pack for the F ??


Daniel on MacBook Pro




On 2015-08-14, 9:04 AM, "NSRCA-discussion on behalf of Randy Forbus via
NSRCA-discussion" <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org on behalf of
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

>That's what I was thinking, doesn't make since that he fail a weight
>check now
>
>________________________________________
>From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
>behalf of Jon Lowe via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:58 PM
>To: NSRCA; Daniel Dupont
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds
>
>There is a whole procedure they have to go thru if they initially fail,
>including using a second scale. That could take time. Let's hope he
>ultimately is OK.  Kind of weird that now he would fail, this late in the
>game.
>
>On Aug 14, 2015 8:50 AM, Daniel Dupont via NSRCA-discussion
><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> He¹s in 11 positon now the score board still doesn¹t show the flight
>>has zero, I hope he¹s ok, a hell of a ride.
>>
>> Daniel on MacBook Pro
>>
>> From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
>>behalf of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion
>><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Reply-To: Scott McHarg <scmcharg at gmail.com>, General pattern discussion
>><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Date: Friday, August 14, 2015 at 8:48 AM
>> To: Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com>
>> Cc: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds
>>
>> IF the information is true, he only failed by 2 grams.  FAI is 5000
>>plus 50 for inconsistencies.  My understanding is he was spot checked
>>and failed with the particular batteries that were chosen for the
>>flight.  This is one time I hope that my information is just dead wrong.
>>
>> Scott A. McHarg
>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>> Texas A&M University
>> PPL - ASEL
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>> How can he fail to make weight, wasn't he weighed before, what did he
>>>add to the plane to give it 52g
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> From: NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
>>>behalf of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion
>>><nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 1:29 PM
>>> To: General pattern discussion
>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds
>>>
>>> Houston, looks like we have a problem.  Joseph put in some decent
>>>flights today but I've heard that he failed weight on Site 1 at 5052 g.
>>> If that's true, his flight will be disqualified and probably knock him
>>>out of the top 10 as that was his better flight.  Joseph has worked his
>>>butt off.  What a crappy way to not make it.
>>>
>>> Either way, he has done and will continue to do a great job!  He has
>>>impressed me the most and has come so very far in a short time.  Don,
>>>please tell the boy we are all very proud!
>>>
>>>
>>> Scott A. McHarg
>>> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
>>> Texas A&M University
>>> PPL - ASEL
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion
>>mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion