[NSRCA-discussion] Worlds
Scott McHarg
scmcharg at gmail.com
Fri Aug 14 05:50:39 AKDT 2015
IF the information is true, he only failed by 2 grams. FAI is 5000 plus 50
for inconsistencies. My understanding is he was spot checked and failed
with the particular batteries that were chosen for the flight. This is one
time I hope that my information is just dead wrong.
*Scott A. McHarg*
VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
Texas A&M University
PPL - ASEL
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Randy Forbus <Rforbus at hotmail.com> wrote:
> How can he fail to make weight, wasn't he weighed before, what did he add
> to the plane to give it 52g
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org> on
> behalf of Scott McHarg via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> *Sent:* Friday, August 14, 2015 1:29 PM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* [NSRCA-discussion] Worlds
>
> Houston, looks like we have a problem. Joseph put in some decent flights
> today but I've heard that he failed weight on Site 1 at 5052 g. If that's
> true, his flight will be disqualified and probably knock him out of the top
> 10 as that was his better flight. Joseph has worked his butt off. What a
> crappy way to not make it.
>
> Either way, he has done and will continue to do a great job! He has
> impressed me the most and has come so very far in a short time. Don,
> please tell the boy we are all very proud!
>
>
> *Scott A. McHarg*
> VSCL / CANVASS U.A.S. Research Pilot
> Texas A&M University
> PPL - ASEL
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150814/8548b7f3/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list