[NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Plenary Meeting

[Ronald Van Putte]

The copy of the 2015 Plenary Meeting -  Agenda I have (attached) has the proposal to remove "and must be selected from a current
list of FAI International Judges” from 5.1.10 on page 42.

Ron


> On Apr 16, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Derek Koopowitz <derekkoopowitz at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> j) 5.1.10 Judging F3 Aero Subcommittee
> Amend paragraph a) as follows:
> a) The judges must be of different nationalities and must be selected from a current
> list of FAI International Judges. Those selected must reflect the approximate
> geographical distribution of teams participating in the previous World Championship
> with the final list approved by the CIAM Bureau. At least one third, but not more
> than two thirds of the judges must not have judged at the previous World
> Championships.
> Reason: Avoid doubling of the rule, 5.1.10 b). The rule is meant to refer only to one,
> the latest previous World Championship.
> 
> k) 5.1.10 Judging F3 Aero Subcommittee
> Amend the paragraph as follows:
> b) The invited judges for a World or Continental Championship, must be selected
> from the current the applicable list of FAI International Judges…
> Reason: Since the available number of international judges may be limited in a
> “current” list, ie a list becoming effective in the year of the championship actually
> held should also serve as a resource of appointable judges.
> 
> 
> The k) item above mentions that the most current list (in this case the list that was submitted in November last year) could be used to select judges.  There is no mention of going back to "lists" of judges that are not current.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Ronald Van Putte via NSRCA-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>> wrote:
> The items below have been extracted from the agenda of the 2015 CIAM Plenary Meeting to be held in the Mövenpick Hotel - Lausanne (Switzerland)
> on Friday 24 April and Saturday 25 April 2015.
> 
> It is proposed that the words in Bold Oblique be removed from the appropriate section.
> 
> The result of the first deletion is that the organizing committee would not have to use names from the current list of international judges and may pick judges whose names are not on the list.
> 
> The second deletion is in line with the first deletion
> 
> The third deletion would remove the requirement for recent judging experience.
> 
> 
> 14.8 Section 4C Volume F3 - RC Aerobatics
> aa) 5.9.10 c) Judging F3 Aero Subcommittee
> Amend the paragraph as follows:
> For World or Continental Championships the organiser must appoint one or more
> panels of five judges each. The judges must be of different nationalities and must be
> selected from a current list of international Judges. Those selected must reflect the
> approximate geographical distribution of teams having participated in the previous
> World Championships (if applicable) and the final list must be approved by the CIAM
> Bureau. At least one third, but not more than two thirds of the judges must not
> have judged at the previous World Championship. Judge assignment to the
> panels will be by random draw.
> Reason: Avoid doubling of the rule, see 5.9.10 d). The rule is meant to refer only to
> one, the latest previous World Championship. Adaption to F3A
> ab) 5.9.10 d) Judging F3 Aero Subcommittee
> Amend the paragraph as follows:
> The invited judges for World or Continental Championships must be selected from a
> current the applicable list of FAI international judges and must have had a
> reasonable amount of F3P or F3A judging experience within the previous twelve
> months and must submit a resume of his judging experience to the organiser when
> accepting the invitation to judge at a World or Continental Championship. The
> organiser must in turn submit the resumes to the CIAM Bureau for approval.
> Reason: Since the available number of international judges may be limited in a
> „current“ list, ie. a list becoming effective in the year of the championship actually
> held should also serve as a resource of appointable judges. Judging criteria in F3P
> are equal to F3A with both of them referring to the ANNEX 5B
> 
> I am not in favor of the deletions and wonder what NSRCA’s and AMA’s plans are.
> 
> Ron Van Putte
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20150416/a63131bb/attachment.html>