[NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

[Larry and Eileen]

The 400 ft. rule is not new, and everyone one in R/C has violated the rule
at some point in time.  If enforced, the limit will put an end to
aerotowing, and most gliding as well.  It's never been an issue, because no
one ever enforced the limit.

 

Larry Fitch

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Stuart Chale via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 11:39 AM
To: Robert L. Beaubien; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

 

We could not fly with a 400 foot limit either.  Patterns would have to
change, planes probably even slower or smaller.

On 6/24/2014 2:34 PM, Robert L. Beaubien via NSRCA-discussion wrote:

Actually it is 303m or 994 ft at 175m.

 

 

-           Robert Beaubien

-           Sr. Software Architect

-           Kool Software LLC

 

"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number
of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."

 

From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Duane Beck via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 11:29 AM
To: Patrick Harris; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

 

Top of a 60 degree box at 175 meters out is almost 500'

 

Duane

 


  _____  


From: "Patrick Harris via NSRCA-discussion"
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>
To: "Peter Vogel" <vogel.peter at gmail.com <mailto:vogel.peter at gmail.com> >,
"General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> >
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:20:47 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] FAA Rules

 

The IMAC boys will have a cow over the 400 foot rule. 

 






_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140624/2001b07e/attachment.html>