[NSRCA-discussion] New advanced question

[Don Ramsey]

I think the new Masters is good. Busy but good. The integrated maneuvers are
a welcome change. 

I haven't flown the Advanced but will next time to field.  Looks like a big
jump from intermediate.  The end point of the triangle may be a question for
the judging committee but to me it ends with a line after center.  At least
half the base at the top has been drawn once on entry (the line segment
after center).  Maneuver could be said to begin at center and end at center
or begin at some point before center to be determined by the exit radius at
the top.  Either way, anything after a line at center would probably not be
part of the maneuver.  So, the rev Cuban eight could start after the exit
line at center.  Just my opinion.

Don


-----Original Message-----
From: NSRCA-discussion [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On
Behalf Of Jas via NSRCA-discussion
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2014 10:34 AM
To: mwaustin54 at cox.net; General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] New advanced question

I flew both the Advanced and Masters patterns yesterday for the guys in the
club that would be flying them. Masters seemed to flow well and I didn't get
much of a dirty look when I landed (took that as it wasn't going to be that
bad lol).
Advanced there was one part that threw the guys for a loop. The triangle at
the end of the pattern. The confusion was where does the Triangle exit/end
so the 1/2 Reverse Cuban 8 can begin? 
Other than that the guys liked it, but maybe next weekend we'll all fly it
and see if they still like it lol.

Sent from my iP

> On Jul 26, 2014, at 11:10 PM, Mike Austin via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
> 
> A couple of us have started flying the new sequence also. Be interesting
to hear more feedback before the sequence is final. Here are my impressions
after a few flights: It's a busy schedule with lots of inverted. It will be
a real challenge for new Intermediate flyers moving up. the sharks tooth
really crowds the Avalanche w/snap in my opinion. I'll have to trim the
cactus tops off to complete the hourglass in one piece.
> 
> Mike
> AZ Pattern Flyers
> 
> ---- Chuck Hochhalter via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote: 
>> It is a half roll then a reverse half roll. 2 of 2 reversed.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On Jul 26, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Jas via NSRCA-discussion
<nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think it's maneuver 5, Sharks Tooth. Is it really 2pts reversed (4
half rolls) on the 45-down (2 one way and 2 the other)? Seems like a lot of
rolls on a 45 downline. Looking to fly it today to show it but want to make
sure I got it right.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion