[NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed sequences

John Gayer jgghome at comcast.net
Mon Aug 18 21:21:15 AKDT 2014


 From the rulebook. 94-95. Actually describes both 1/2 roll and 1/4 roll





 From an AAM article in 1969. I never saw anyone fly this maneuver in 
1969 or for many years afterwards and it was optional. Picture seems to 
be pretty clear that it was intended to be a rolling loop, not a loop 
with a quick 1/2 roll every 90 degrees.

On 8/18/2014 10:50 PM, Dave Lockhart wrote:
>
> I am quite certain the #14 Cobra is a misprint...it should read ½ 
> rolls....which is what the diagram shows.
>
> My participation does not go back to the days before retracts....but 
> I'd be very surprised if the two roll loop was 2 integrated rolls.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Dave
>
> *From:*NSRCA-discussion 
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *John 
> Gayer via NSRCA-discussion
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:35 AM
> *To:* NSRCA Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 proposed sequences
>
> Advanced and Masters are not our entry classes and should not affect 
> future participation. Those new to pattern should begin in either 
> Sportsman or Intermediate depending on skill level. When a flyer feels 
> he is ready to move up, he will try flying the next class in practice. 
> If it is too difficult to even see a way to fly that sequence 
> reasonably, then that pilot was not ready to move up and should stay 
> in his current class another year (or more). We do not lose people 
> because they stayed in their current class, we lose them because they 
> moved up when not ready and find they are outclassed without the 
> vision, coordination, time to practice (or name your reason) to be 
> competitive. Not competitive for winning, just competitive.
> Both Masters and Advanced can, and probably will be, changed next 
> year. Any substantial problems can be addressed then. Many have tested 
> these sequences. All have have flown them successfully, if not always 
> happily. We can go on and on about ugly maneuvers, difficulty levels 
> and dislike of change but that happens every cycle.
>
> Just for comparison here are Advanced and Masters from 20 years ago. 
> Overall both appear somewhat easier than the current sequences we are 
> flying but not a lot. Total KFactors are a bit lower. Also we are 
> flying many of the same maneuvers. I hope you noticed the knife edge 
> top of the cobra in masters. If you go back even further you can find 
> a two roll loop in the days before retracts...
>
> John Gayer
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140819/36619590/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hdjefgbg.png
Type: image/png
Size: 53045 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140819/36619590/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ciifjfbj.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 40385 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140819/36619590/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 48894 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140819/36619590/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38802 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140819/36619590/attachment-0001.jpe>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list