[NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Proposed Advanced Sequence

[astropuppy]

I proof read a lot better then I fly. The whole idea of pointing the
airplane at the ground and turn it upside down gets my attention everytime.


On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:41 PM, RJ Bohn via NSRCA-discussion <
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:

> THAT’S the phrase I was looking for!  Document control!
>
> Rich
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:34 PM, Anthony Romano via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> After flying the previous version this weekend the revision looks very
> good. Adding the half roll to the shark's tooth makes a much better balance
> to the amount of inverted flight and complexity of the sequence. The
> triangle is an interesting way to add some inverted at a safer altitude.
> The reverse cuban from the top could be taxing but looking forward to
> hearing the feedback from the advanced pilots in my club.
>
> Anthony Romano
>
> Revision numbers or a date would be a good idea! Document control always
> helps.
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2014 15:22:56 -0400
> To: revolutionman at gci.net; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2015 Proposed Advanced Sequence
> From: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>
> Thanks!
>
> I would suggest, just for giggles, on *any* of the sequences, a version #
> or date be added with the link.  Or a little GIF saying “NEW”?
>
> Jason and Mike are out flying the newest revision.  I like it!
>
> Rich Bohn
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 3:03 PM, RJ Bohn via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> ALCON,
>
>  I went to the site and found the same sequence as last week… I think.
> Are these .pdf files dated anywhere?
>
> Richard Bohn
>
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 2:36 PM, Jas via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
>  Dale,
>
> I'm out at the field with one of our Advanced pilots and he likes the
> changes. I'm going to fly through it once for him and then call it for him.
> Updates later.
>
> Sent from my iP
>
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 12:24 PM, Dale Olstinske via NSRCA-discussion <
> nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> wrote:
>
> Over that past few weeks, we have received a lot of input from the
> membership about the Advanced sequence proposed for 2015. To everyone who
> has, a big thanks, we really need this in order to develop sequences that
> meet the expectations of the majority of the membership. I would add, it
> is very helpful when these inputs are specific, not just "I don't like it".
> Much of the criticism about this sequence was in two areas, difficulty and
> new maneuvers, let me address each.
>
> The guide allows for new maneuvers to be created. The list of maneuvers in
> the development guide is not meant to be exhaustive. Each time we develop
> new schedules, new ones are created or borrowed from other disciplines,
> like F3A or even do I dare say, IMAC LOL! In this proposed sequence, there
> are a few maneuvers that were previously not in the catalog, like
> the Immelman with full rolls, the Hour Glass or the Cobra as we defined. As
> along at these are in line with class guidelines and it's felt they are
> appropriate, they are added to the list of allowable maneuvers.
> Specifically, the Hour Glass was added because we all felt it was
> appropriate, and a variant of that maneuver is now in Masters and F3A-P. So
> as you will see, we left it in.
>
> As to difficulty, we had enough pilots indicate concern, that we took
> another look. In doing so, we realized that we had exceeded some of the
> boundaries set forth in the Advanced section. The guide has been a living
> breathing document for the past few cycles, so we could have modified the
> guide to allow for this sequence, but it was felt this was the wrong
> approach. Now, for the next cycle, we will be recommending some changes to
> the guide (for BOD approval) which would allow more flexibility, however
> for now, we are modifying the sequence to adhere to the guidelines.
> Specifically, there are only limited number of inverted entries and exits,
> on turn around maneuvers, executed at a low altitude. You will see in the
> new sequence, we simply added and removed rolls, which brought the number
> of inverted sections in line. The basic structure and class of each
> maneuvers, are really unchanged.
>
> The new sequence is now posted on the NSRCA web site. Again a big thanks
> for all who took the time to let us know.
>
> Dale
> Sequence Committee
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing
> list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20140804/925c5aae/attachment.html>