[NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???

[Larry Diamond]

Maybe this will offset the effects of the sequestration... :^)



________________________________
From: Phil S. <chuenkan at comcast.net>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???



Well, Dave, the essential salaries of our "congressmen" would NOT get shut down!  They don't earn the $191.000/yr they get when congress is in session and "functioning", so why deny them when the government is shut down?

Phil Spelt, KCRC Emeritus, Past President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA L-18, Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
On 9/30/2013 11:53 AM, Dave Burton wrote: 
I’m having trouble seeing the downside of a Govt. shutdown. Perhaps they would run all essential stuff and shut down the non essential stuff!
>Naaah, that wouldn’t happen, probably the other way around.
> 
>From:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ronald Van Putte
>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 10:08 AM
>To: General pattern discussion
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
> 
>No, the downwind turn is easier to understand and makes more sense.
> 
>BTW, all those in favor of having the salaries of all members of Congress and their staffs suspended until they get the job done, say, "Aye".
> 
>Ron
> 
>On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Randy Forbus wrote:
>
>
>
>Is this the same as the government shut down?
>
>________________________________
>
>From: vanputter at gmail.com
>Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:53:23 -0500
>To: mups1953 at yahoo.com; nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
>
>Or the downwind turn.
> 
>Ron
> 
>On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:56 AM, mike mueller wrote:
> 
>>What we need is a discussion on snap rolls. That'll wake everyone up. Mike
>> 
>>Mike Mueller
>>Customer Services 
>> F3AUnlimited
>> 
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>From: Gordon Seeling <gseeling at q.com>
>>To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>>Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 6:59 AM
>>Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] nsrca shutdown???
>>
>>toooo quiet!!!
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
>
>_______________________________________________ NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
>
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20131001/898c0a3b/attachment.html>