[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Wed Jul 10 11:22:28 AKDT 2013

Which means we are all certifiable<g>

Nuts that is.

Which brings up another question. The FAI rule book is good through 2015?  Does that mean we do not need to recertify until the new book comes out for 2016?

If that is the case, certifications should be good through the end of 2015 not 2013?

From: cahochhalter at yahoo.com
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 11:35:32 -0500
To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

So basically now we need to recertify annually?

Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

Because AMA and FAI are on different rules cycles, a year apart.  Happened several cycles ago.  AMA Masters and Advanced sequences and rules changed for this year.  FAI changed in 2012.

Jon

-----Original Message-----

From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:59 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Thanks Jon, but how does that happen?

C

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

Chuck,

I was partially incorrect.  You show as current for FAI, but not AMA.

For all,

As Derek said, you MUST sign in to the site to see the judges list.  You do NOT have to be an NSRCA member to get a login.  On the pull down, you can sort by various means (last name, district, etc).

Keith,

It's only a flesh wound...

Jon

-----Original Message-----

From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>

To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:31 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Time for some Monty python quotes.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

Uh, huh . . . feeling oppressed yet?

From: mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com 

Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:37 AM

To: General pattern discussion 

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

Ok I don't see where that is 
Jon. I see a drop down on the top that leads to the wrong list like John but 
nothing on the right. Am I on the right site?????

Also I thought it had to be everyother year like Chuck and I 
certified before the Nats last year. It's every year now?

Thanks, Mike

Mike Mueller

F3Aunlimited

From: Jon Lowe 
<jonlowe at aol.com>

To: 
nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 

Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24 
AM

Subject: Re: 
[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

On the right hand side of the screen there 
is a pull down menu where you select the Certified Judges list.  Not real 
obvious, I will admit.

Jon

-----Original 
Message-----

From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>

To: 
'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>

Sent: 
Wed, Jul 10, 2013 9:19 am

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS 
Judging

Scott/Derek

If you go to the 
website and click on judging/certification/certified judges list you get this 
list “This list will produce a 
list of all registered members of the website that have verified their email 
addresses.  This is not a list of NSRCA members.”’

What you do not 
get is a list of certified judges.  For that you must go to 
Lists/membership lists.   ????????????

John

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org 
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?] 
On Behalf Of Archie Stafford

Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 
9:58 AM

To: NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

Subject: 
[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

There are still 
quite a few people attending the NATS who have not taken the judging 
certification test.  You are REQUIRED to be certified to judge at the 
NATS.  If you are not certified, that means you miss a judging session and 
will lose your highest round.  

Please take the 
time, if you have not done so to go to the NSRCA site and complete the judging 
test...

Arch

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion 
mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing 
list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________

NSRCA-discussion mailing list

NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org

http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130710/7d42c3b2/attachment.html>