[NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging

[Jon Carter]

Yes, for either FAI or AMA. The tests and study material are free to NSRCA members.

Thanks,

Jon Carter

Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com> wrote:

>So basically now we need to recertify annually?
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jul 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Because AMA and FAI are on different rules cycles, a year apart. 
>Happened several cycles ago.  AMA Masters and Advanced sequences and
>rules changed for this year.  FAI changed in 2012.
>> Jon
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:59 am
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
>> 
>> Thanks Jon, but how does that happen?
>> 
>> C
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jul 10, 2013, at 10:56 AM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Chuck,
>>> I was partially incorrect.  You show as current for FAI, but not
>AMA.
>>>  
>>> For all,
>>> As Derek said, you MUST sign in to the site to see the judges list. 
>You do NOT have to be an NSRCA member to get a login.  On the pull
>down, you can sort by various means (last name, district, etc).
>>>  
>>> Keith,
>>> It's only a flesh wound...
>>> Jon
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chuck Hochhalter <cahochhalter at yahoo.com>
>>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 10:31 am
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
>>> 
>>> Time for some Monty python quotes.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Jul 10, 2013, at 9:38 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com>
>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Uh, huh . . . feeling oppressed yet?
>>>>  
>>>> From: mikemueller at f3aunlimited.com
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:37 AM
>>>> To: General pattern discussion
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
>>>>  
>>>> Ok I don't see where that is Jon. I see a drop down on the top that
>leads to the wrong list like John but nothing on the right. Am I on the
>right site?????
>>>> Also I thought it had to be everyother year like Chuck and I
>certified before the Nats last year. It's every year now?
>>>> Thanks, Mike
>>>>  
>>>> Mike Mueller
>>>> F3Aunlimited
>>>>  
>>>> From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
>>>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:24 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
>>>>  
>>>> On the right hand side of the screen there is a pull down menu
>where you select the Certified Judges list.  Not real obvious, I will
>admit.
>>>> Jon
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: John Fuqua <johnfuqua at embarqmail.com>
>>>> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>> Sent: Wed, Jul 10, 2013 9:19 am
>>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS  Judging
>>>> 
>>>> Scott/Derek
>>>> If you go to the website and click on
>judging/certification/certified judges list you get this list “This
>list will produce a list of all registered members of the website that
>have verified their email addresses.  This is not a list of NSRCA
>members.”’
>>>>  
>>>> What you do not get is a list of certified judges.  For that you
>must go to Lists/membership lists.   ????????????
>>>>  
>>>> John
>>>>  
>>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
>[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org?] On Behalf Of Archie
>Stafford
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 9:58 AM
>>>> To: NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] NATS Judging
>>>>  
>>>> There are still quite a few people attending the NATS who have not
>taken the judging certification test.  You are REQUIRED to be certified
>to judge at the NATS.  If you are not certified, that means you miss a
>judging session and will lose your highest round. 
>>>>  
>>>> Please take the time, if you have not done so to go to the NSRCA
>site and complete the judging test...
>>>>  
>>>> Arch
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130710/00a4c395/attachment.html>