[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Ed Alt]

I dare not say.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:09 PM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:

> What would you call “normal”?
>  
> From: Ed Alt
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:05 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Cc: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> Well, I guess we really gave  Ken some great test feedback.  Looks like the forum is still working normally!
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:57 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think we were up to 0, then A, then B . . .
>>  
>> From: Peter Vogel
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:54 AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone5
>> 
>> On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Robert Beaubien
>>> 
>>> <!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->D7 Webmaster
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47      AM
>>> To: General pattern discussion
>>> Cc: General pattern discussion
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Can you please express that in octal?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Larry Diamond
>>> 
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
>>> 
>>> To: General pattern discussion
>>> 
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
>>> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> There is always one… lol 789
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
>>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 456
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Ken Velez
>>> 
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
>>> 
>>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>>> 
>>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 123
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/54f4b5e7/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion