[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Larry Diamond]

OAB
O, I get it, AB Normal


________________________________
From: Keith Hoard <klhoard at hotmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY


I think we were up to 0, then A, then B . . . 

From: Peter Vogel 
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:54 AM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
No, 0AB hex is the bit pattern:  010101011 which is octal 2(010)5(101)3(011)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:51 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:


Well, after 0AB hex, octal would be 15/16/17 (or 567)
> 
><!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->Robert Beaubien
><!--[if !supportLists]-->-          <!--[endif]-->D7 Webmaster
> 
>"No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
> 
>From:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:47 AM
>To: General pattern discussion
>Cc: General pattern discussion
>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
> 
>Can you please express that in octal?
>
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>> 
>>From:Larry Diamond 
>>Sent:Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
>>To:General pattern discussion 
>>Subject:Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>> 
>>From:Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
>>To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
>>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>There is always one… lol 789
>> 
>>From:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>>Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
>>To: 'General pattern discussion'
>>Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>456
>> 
>>From:Ken Velez 
>>Sent:Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
>>To:'General pattern discussion' 
>>Subject:[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>> 
>>123
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>________________________________
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

________________________________
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/2813cd95/attachment.html>