[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Peter Vogel]

By the way, in case it wasn't clear, that's for all possible values of 'I' and 'you all' ... :-)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 9:17 AM, Peter Vogel <vogel.peter at gmail.com> wrote:

> 0-A-B would be 0-10-11 decimal or 0-12-13 octal, but only if you are treating the hex digits individually, Keith's expression in Hex was 0AB. If he wanted to continue from 789 it should be ABC. 
> 
> Ed's request to express in octal breaks down in that pattern because we already had illegal octal digits (8 and 9) from Ken. 
> 
> If we assume Ken's response did not   count because he was the original poster, then we have 7 10 11 octal in response to Ed's 456. 
> 
> As usual on this list, we analyze everything to exhaustion and arrive at no clear conclusion :-). Well, except I'm right and you're all wrong :-) :-)
> 
> Sent from my iPhone5
> 
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:59 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>> Made the same mistake I almost made.  Octal is 0-7 so 0AB would be 12-13-14
>>  
>> -          Robert Beaubien
>> -          Sr. Software Architect
>> -          Kool Software LLC
>>  
>> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>>  
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:52 AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> 00 – 12 - 13
>>  
>> From: Ed Alt
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Cc: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> Can you please express that in octal?
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>>  
>> From: Larry Diamond
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23  AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>>  
>> From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
>> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> There is always one… lol 789
>>  
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> 456
>>  
>> From: Ken Velez
>> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33  AM
>> To: 'General pattern discussion'
>> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>>  
>> 123
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/cdb1cfa2/attachment.html>