[NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY

[Peter Vogel]

0-A-B would be 0-10-11 decimal or 0-12-13 octal, but only if you are treating the hex digits individually, Keith's expression in Hex was 0AB. If he wanted to continue from 789 it should be ABC. 

Ed's request to express in octal breaks down in that pattern because we already had illegal octal digits (8 and 9) from Ken. 

If we assume Ken's response did not   count because he was the original poster, then we have 7 10 11 octal in response to Ed's 456. 

As usual on this list, we analyze everything to exhaustion and arrive at no clear conclusion :-). Well, except I'm right and you're all wrong :-) :-)

Sent from my iPhone5

On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:59 AM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:

> Made the same mistake I almost made.  Octal is 0-7 so 0AB would be 12-13-14
>  
> -          Robert Beaubien
> -          Sr. Software Architect
> -          Kool Software LLC
>  
> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>  
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Keith Hoard
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 9:52 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> 00 – 12 - 13
>  
> From: Ed Alt
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Cc: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO  NOT REPLY
>  
> Can you please express that in octal?
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jan 24, 2013, at 11:31 AM, "Keith Hoard" <klhoard at hotmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm, that’s weird.  He asked for us to NOT REPLY, but I find myself strangely drawn to reply anyway . . . Oh yeah, (for the programmers –> 0AB )
>  
> From: Larry Diamond
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:23 AM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> OK, I won't reply... again !!!!!!
>  
> From: Ken Velez <kvelez at rochester.rr.com>
> To: 'General pattern discussion' <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 1:41 AM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> There is always one… lol 789
>  
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ed Alt
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:41 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> 456
>  
> From: Ken Velez
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 2:33 AM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Test DO NOT REPLY
>  
> 123
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130124/ea6c8a08/attachment.html>