[NSRCA-discussion] Prelims

[kingconsulting]

Yeah that is awesome Joesph!  Most of us can only dream to be in something like that. You actually did!

Robert King

On Aug 21, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Vincebrc <vincebrc at gmail.com> wrote:

> It is just incredible that a 13 rears old boy could fly at WC level.  Congratulations Joseph for a job well done. 
> Vicente "Vince" Bortone
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Aug 21, 2013, at 2:43 PM, "Ryan Smith" <smaragdz at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
>> Agreed.
>>  
>> Another flyer flew in their first WC  in South Africa at age 12. This same flyer went on to win the WC later in his flying career...along with pretty much everything else. Go Joseph!
>>  
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Archie Stafford
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 2:40 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>>  
>> I think we all need to congratulate Joseph also. At 13 he put on a heck of a performance against the best in the world. He's a good kid who has worked very hard for this. I am sure he will be representing the US for many years to come. Great Job Joseph! D2 is very proud.
>> 
>> Arch
>> 
>> On Aug 21, 2013 2:36 PM, "Scott" <vze23c3q at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Indeed the rule states one third...I thought it stated 30%.  Thanks.
>> From: Robert L. Beaubien
>> Sent: 8/21/2013 2:02 PM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>> 
>> 1/3 is 33.3%, not 30%
>>  
>> 80*33.3% = 26.64
>>  
>> -           Robert Beaubien
>> -           Sr. Software Architect
>> -           Kool Software LLC
>>  
>> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>>  
>> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Scott
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2013 10:59 AM
>> To: General pattern discussion
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>>  
>> 30% of 80 is 24, are the other 3 juniors?
>> From: Jon Lowe
>> Sent: 8/21/2013 1:35 PM
>> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>> 
>> Top 1/3, so about 27 this year.  The rules also say no more than 30, but that doesn't apply this year.
>> Jon
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Vincebrc <vincebrc at gmail.com>
>> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Cc: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> Sent: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 12:31 pm
>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>> 
>> I lost track.  How many goes to semifinals?
>> Thanks,  Vicente "Vince" Bortone
>>  
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>  
>> On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:13 PM, "Atwood, Mark" <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com> wrote:
>>  
>> > Trying to get them all through including the semi flight order.
>> > 
>> > Sent from my average intelligence  phone
>>  
>> > 
>> > 
>> > On Aug 21, 2013, at 7:11 PM, "Jon Lowe" <jonlowe at aol.com<mailto:jonlowe at aol.com>> 
>> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Mark,
>> > Did they publish results for all competitors of the prelims, maybe a second 
>> page of what you posted?  Would like to see where Joseph ended up compared to 
>> the others.
>> > Jon
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Atwood, Mark <atwoodm at paragon-inc.com<mailto:atwoodm at paragon-inc.com>>
>> > To: NSRCA General <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>>
>> > Sent: Wed, Aug 21, 2013 11:57 am
>> > Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Prelims
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Flight order for semis.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>  
>> [The entire original message is not included.]
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20130821/4dcdeb42/attachment.html>