[NSRCA-discussion] Six point roll

[Derek Koopowitz]

The maneuver is called a 6 point roll
 each point is at 60 degrees.

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 10:49 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Six point roll

 

Then the 1st part would not state 2 of an 8 and the 2nd part would not state
3 of a 4. 

 

    

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Derek Koopowitz <mailto:derekkoopowitz at gmail.com>  

To: 'General pattern discussion' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>  

Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 1:41 PM

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Six point roll

 

Each point is at 60 degrees
 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360.

 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Del
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 6:50 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Six point roll

 

Without having the accurate maneuver description  I would suggest 1st 2
points are 45º rolls with the following 3 being 90º rolls. 

 

    Del

----- Original Message ----- 

From: tocdon at netscape.net 

To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org 

Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 9:11 PM

Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Six point roll

 

Can someone define this.  (For those adept in ETOC lingo).  I did see one
once at an IAC event many years ago if its what I think it is.  (2 of an 8
followed by 3 of 4)

 

Many thanks,

Don

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120310/fe7d2a10/attachment.html>