[NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

[J N Hiller]

Thanks Scott and thank you to the committee members and NSRCA board for
advancing these proposals.
Jim Hiller

-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]On Behalf Of Scott McHarg
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:50 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules Proposals

Hello,
   As promised, here are the raw results of the survey.  107 unique
individuals took the survey.  Individuals that felt it necessary to vote
multiple times had their responses deleted and only their original answers
accepted.  Based, in part, to Dean Pappas' post on RCU and through the
comments listed there, through email, phone conversation, discussion on this
list and in person, the Safety Proposal was adjusted to the "What" instead
of the "How".  The new Safety Proposal will be posted shortly on the NSRCA
website.  The NSRCA BoD met last night to vote on these candidate proposals.
The original Safety proposal was taken off the table (the one that you saw
in the survey) and the new proposal was then voted on.  Based on survey
results, District VP interaction with his constituents and posts on RCU as
well as this NSRCA discussion list, the BoD unanimously passed the new
Safety Proposal, the Class Advancement as well as the Telemetry proposal for
submittal to the AMA Rules Committee.  The Weight proposal also passed with
a vote of 9 to 1.



   We would like to thank those of you who took the survey and appreciate
not only the time that it took for you to fill out the survey, but your
dedication to this hobby.  The Rules Proposals will now be sent to the AMA
for further review and discussion.  Attached are the survey results both in
raw (all members) and NSRCA members only form.  I have also attached all
four of the proposals again (with the new Safety Proposal) for your
consumption.





Thank you again,
Scott


--
Scott A. McHarg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120309/6b3f5a4a/attachment.html>