[NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test

[prokr at sasktel.net]

Sorry to hear that, Lucienne.  I have your skirt put together for a 
quick evaluation.  If you feel like coming for a few minutes and 
checking it out, you are welcome.   I have a skirt put together for Kea 
also.  Those few minutes over the weekend were very helpful. 

If in your wisdom  I don't see you tonight, then I'll look forward to 
next week. 
Pat

On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 14:49:00 -0500, Keith Hoard  wrote:

       Errrr, how about Pig Latin Latin?

"Dilliu Elatin Idic Nno Tpotes"

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2012, at 13:58, Bob Kane  wrote:

       Illiud Latine dici non potest . . . . 

  Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com

-------------------------
   From: Keith Hoard
  To: General pattern discussion
  Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:03 PM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test

Perhaps the answers should be given in Latin?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:47, Ronald Van Putte  wrote:

       Yeah, but, when downgrading maneuvers flown more than 200 meters 
out, ""severely downgraded"  is an acceptable answer, but "downgraded 
severely" is wrong. 

Ron

On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:

       Believe it or not but I did put "hole" as an acceptable answer. 

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ronald Van Putte  wrote:

       Scoring in "Hole" number increments is an acceptable answer for 
those who are "spelling challenged". 

Ron

On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:

       Bob,

Thanks for the feedback... I made the change to allow for your answer. 

-Derek

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Bob Kane  wrote:

        I just completed the online FAI re-certification test.  I 
passed, but did get few wrong.  At least one of my answers marked wrong 
was correct, except it did not match any of the answer strings.  I 
typed "1 to 4" as a downgrade, and the correct answers were "1-4" or 
"one to four".  A human would have accepted my answer. 

The exam also stopped providing feedback toward the end, maybe I timed out?

Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

  _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

       _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

       _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------------------

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120613/857006a2/attachment.html>