[NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test

[Keith Hoard]

Errrr, how about Pig Latin Latin?

"Dilliu Elatin Idic Nno Tpotes"

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2012, at 13:58, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:

Illiud Latine dici non potest . . . .


Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com
  ------------------------------
*From:* Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
*To:* General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:03 PM
*Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test

Perhaps the answers should be given in Latin?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:47, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

Yeah, but, when downgrading maneuvers flown more than 200 meters out,
""severely downgraded"  is an acceptable answer, but "downgraded severely"
is wrong.

Ron

On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:

Believe it or not but I did put "hole" as an acceptable answer.

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

Scoring in "Hole" number increments is an acceptable answer for those who
are "spelling challenged".

Ron

On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:

Bob,

Thanks for the feedback... I made the change to allow for your answer.

-Derek

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:

I just completed the online FAI re-certification test.  I passed, but did
get few wrong.  At least one of my answers marked wrong was correct, except
it did not match any of the answer strings.  I typed "1 to 4" as a
downgrade, and the correct answers were "1-4" or "one to four".  A human
would have accepted my answer.

The exam also stopped providing feedback toward the end, maybe I timed out?


Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion



_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 _______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120613/83c1ef19/attachment.html>