[NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test

[Bob Kane]

Illiud Latine dici non potest . . . .

 

Bob Kane
getterflash at yahoo.com


________________________________
 From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Online FAI re-certification test
 

Perhaps the answers should be given in Latin?

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:47, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:


Yeah, but, when downgrading maneuvers flown more than 200 meters out, ""severely downgraded"  is an acceptable answer, but "downgraded severely" is wrong.
>
>
>Ron
>
>
>On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:20 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>
>Believe it or not but I did put "hole" as an acceptable answer.
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>>
>>Scoring in "Hole" number increments is an acceptable answer for those who are "spelling challenged".  
>>>
>>>
>>>Ron
>>>
>>>
>>>On Jun 13, 2012, at 11:44 AM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>Bob,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks for the feedback... I made the change to allow for your answer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-Derek
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:19 AM, Bob Kane <getterflash at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>I just completed the online FAI re-certification test.  I passed, but did get few wrong.  At least one of my answers marked wrong was correct, except it did not match any of the answer strings.  I typed "1 to 4" as a downgrade, and the correct answers were "1-4" or "one to four".  A human would have accepted my answer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The exam also stopped providing feedback toward the end, maybe I timed out?
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>>Bob Kane
>>>>>getterflash at yahoo.com
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
_______________________________________________
>NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120613/d085fb6b/attachment.html>