[NSRCA-discussion] Sequence Committee

[Tbruzewski]

I believe he was thinking it was from the bottom after an immelman, which would put you at the top of the box.  That would put you up very high.
 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
To: nsrca-discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 4:10 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Sequence Committee


It is an 8 sided outside loop from the top.  No taller than if it was an inside from the bottom.  Guess I don't understand the issue.

Jon


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill's Email <silentav8r at cox.net>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 1:18 pm
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Sequence Committee


Just a fast first look at the newly proposed Advanced sequence it seems 
to me that the downwind 8-sided loop is going to be very tall since it 
follows an Immelman Turn and precedes a 1/2-outside loop. The top of 
that loop could be way up in the sky. Harder to judge properly.


On 6/4/12 11:02 AM, Dale Olstinske wrote:
> Also, we just posted a revised proposed 2013/14 advanced schedule there, for 
all to try out. All comments welcome.
>
> Dale
>

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120604/21c8f708/attachment.html>