[NSRCA-discussion] Falcon Carbon Fiber Electric Props

[Ron Hansen]

That would be at the advertiser's expense (e.g., Constant Contact
subscription) and may require an upgrade to their website another expense.



-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Budd
Engineering
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 12:09 AM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Falcon Carbon Fiber Electric Props

My suggestion then is for the supplier to offer the customer the ability to
sign up for direct eMail advertising/mailers to the customer, no need for
NSRCA to sponsor/provide that capability...

Jerry

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 5, 2012, at 8:39 PM, "Robert L. Beaubien" <rob at koolsoft.com> wrote:

> Amen!  I, for one, have no problem getting emailed specials and new
> products from k-Factor advertisers.  Once a month works for me even. 
> I want to know what is new out there when it happens, not 2 months
> later when I get my k-factor.
>
> - Robert Beaubien
> - D7 Webmaster
> -
>
> "No trees were harmed in the sending of this message, however a large
> number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Ron
> Hansen
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 5:20 PM
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Falcon Carbon Fiber Electric Props
>
> Why don't we let those who advertise in the K-Factor also advertise on
> a limited basis using the mailing list.
>
> Maybe 4 times per year???
>
> That would make it even more attractive to advertisers.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
> [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob
> Richards
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 4:06 PM
> To: General pattern discussion
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Falcon Carbon Fiber Electric Props
>
> This whole thing has devolved into something unfortunate.
>
> Ron, I believe you acted with good intentions, but the rule, as has
> been pointed out, is clear. However, I think you have been chastised
> more than enough.
>
> The overall reaction, although there is no rule against that, has been
> IMHO excessive. C'mon, guys, does anyone think Ron wasn't acting as a
> pattern dude wanting to help others? There are probably not too many
> people here that have done as much to promote this hobby for as long
> as he has.
>
> When I was active in pattern, it was the camaraderie that I looked
> forward to, not the banter of rules and "I'm going to take my ball and
> go home".
> When did things change?
>
> JMHO.
>
> Bob R.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/5/12, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> I was trying to help out pilots who were having trouble getting their
> airplanes below the 5000 gram limit that will be rigorously enforced
> at the Nats.  The tremendous weight saving of using the Falcon CF
> props could help them a lot.  I also thought the widespread use of
> Falcon CF props at the Nats would boost everyones' sales of Falcon
> props.  I should not have mentioned the price.
>
>
> However, due to the adverse reaction which has erupted, I will no
> longer be bringing Falcon props to the Nats to sell.
>
>
> Ron Van Putte
>
>
>
> On Jul 5, 2012, at 8:50 AM, Phil S. wrote:
>
>
> It looked to me more like a pattern dude trying to help fellow pilots
> than an "ad" for a retailer.  Just MHO...
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 7274 (20120705) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 7274 (20120705) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus
> signature database 7274 (20120705) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 7274 (20120705) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com





__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 7275 (20120706) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com