[NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals

[Keith Hoard]

I'm bringing my digital calipers to the Nats this year to enforce the 1"
lettering rule. . .
.
We all have to have our pet peeves. . .

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com




On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

> No need to worry, nobody checks that any more than the airplanes' weight,
> size, markings, gyros, autopilots, battery voltage and radii of surfaces or
> prop hubs are.
>
> Ron
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Dennis Bodary wrote:
>
> Thanks i forgot all about that one.
>
> --- On *Tue, 1/3/12, Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 4:03 PM
>
> I think you'd also need to waive the "no touchy the airplane" rule, also.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 3, 2012, at 12:56, Dennis Bodary <d_bodary at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I wanna fly a full size extra in pattern, I can't make the weight or the
> noise rules much less the 2-meter rule. And i can't fit the pattern in the
> box. Can we maybe get rid of all those rules just to benefit me? Oh yeah
> and i am going to need extra money for pilot lessons, hanger fees, fuel
> etc. etc. Probably going to need longer runways as well. So we should raise
> everyone elses entry fees to 1,000.00 per contest and of course i would
> enter free. and i would get 970.00 of everyone's entry fee to help me pay
> my cost. What do you think Joe?
>
> Think it'll fly? Think it'll fly now that's a funny one.
>
> Happy New Year. Hope everyone had a good holiday.
>
> --- On *Tue, 1/3/12, Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals
> To: "NSRCA Discussion List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Tuesday, January 3, 2012, 1:38 PM
>
>  Boy , not having any rules proposals would be a first. Yeah right. Fat
> chance<g>
>
>  > From: jnhiller at earthlink.net
> > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 09:43:23 -0800
> > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] 2012 13 AMA rules change proposals
> >
> > It may be about time for rules change proposals to be considered. The AMA
> > deadline is March 15 2012.
> > Is an NSRCA survey being planned?
> > Maybe we don't need any changes this cycle!
> > Jim Hiller
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120104/bbdc72a2/attachment.html>