[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Sun Feb 19 18:32:06 AKST 2012

Wouldn't Aresti in Braille on both cheeks be cool?

Just think..no more call sheets for your caller!!

Dave Harmon

NSRCA 586

K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net

Sperry, Ok.

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Peter Vogel
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 8:05 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

I can see the call card now:

16.  Cobra without rolls

17.  Landing

18.  Full Moon without wadding

:-)

Peter+

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com> wrote:

I don't know, I would have to give points if someone had a tattoo on their
butt that says "out of the box". LOL.

--- On Sun, 2/19/12, Dave Harmon <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

Probably zero the whole flight after that!

Dave Harmon

NSRCA 586 

K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net 

Sperry, Ok. 

From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org
[mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Bob Richards
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:08 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

.... and to make sure the pilot is not "armed" the panties must be on the
ground when not flying. As soon as a flight is finished, he/she must drop
panties in front of the judges.

:-)

Bob R.

--- On Fri, 2/17/12, Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com> > wrote:

From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com> >
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org> >
Date: Friday, February 17, 2012, 11:52 PM 

Geeze, now I have to come up with another rules proposal:

  A pattern competitor's "panties" must be in the Full and Extended position
from the time his aircraft enters the ready box, until the caller retrieves
his airplane after an official flight.  If a competitors panties become
"wadded" during a flight, the judges will immediately direct the pilot to
land his airplane and all maneuvers following the "wadding" will be scored
Zero.

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com>  

From: Scott McHarg
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scmcharg@gmail.com>  

Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:25 PM

To: General pattern discussion
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org>  

Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Hi Dan,
   It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would enjoy
greatly as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have several filters
in place so I'll just filter out the duplicate entries.  We will know who is
trying to "pad the results".  There were several folks that were having
trouble accessing the system so we had to remove the one time per user.
Either way, only the initial entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just
to screw it up for everyone, we'll just shut it down.  You're right, it
makes it a bit useless when people do that.

Have a good weekend,
Scott

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=warrior523@att.net> > wrote:

Guys,

When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and submitted my
answers.  Then I could not get back in to the survey.  Which I assume was to
stop a person from voting more than once.  Well, I was on the website
earlier tonight and for the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and
behold I was back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit
submit, I get the results sumitted message.  It appears that a person can
vote as many times as they see fit now.  I had another person or two try the
same thing with the same results.  Is this feature okay or is it making the
survey results a bit useless?

It may still be only countng the first time you voted or submitted but that
is not the way it appears.  Anybody got an answer???

Dan

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

-- 
Scott A. McHarg 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-----Inline Attachment Follows----- 

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.
org> 
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-- 

Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training

Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark

  <http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7163/6513778381_5569cc985d_m.jpg> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120220/0d534aed/attachment.html>