[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

Sun Feb 19 17:04:42 AKST 2012

I can see the call card now:

16.  Cobra without rolls
17.  Landing
18.  Full Moon without wadding

:-)

Peter+

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Bob Richards <bob at toprudder.com> wrote:

> I don't know, I would have to give points if someone had a tattoo on their
> butt that says "out of the box". LOL.
>
>
> --- On *Sun, 2/19/12, Dave Harmon <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net>* wrote:
>
>
>
>   Probably zero the whole flight after that!
>
>
>
> *Dave Harmon*
>
> *NSRCA 586*
>
> *K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net*
>
> *Sperry, Ok.*
>
>
>
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] *On Behalf Of *Bob Richards
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 19, 2012 7:08 PM
> *To:* General pattern discussion
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
>
>
>
> .... and to make sure the pilot is not "armed" the panties must be on the
> ground when not flying. As soon as a flight is finished, he/she must drop
> panties in front of the judges.
>
>
>
> :-)
>
>
>
> Bob R.
>
>
>
> --- On *Fri, 2/17/12, Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com>
> >* wrote:
>
>
> From: Keith Hoard <khoard at gmail.com<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com>
> >
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
> To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> >
> Date: Friday, February 17, 2012, 11:52 PM
>
> Geeze, now I have to come up with another rules proposal:
>
>
>
>   A pattern competitor’s “panties” must be in the Full and Extended
> position from the time his aircraft enters the ready box, until the caller
> retrieves his airplane after an official flight.  If a competitors panties
> become “wadded” during a flight, the judges will immediately direct the
> pilot to land his airplane and all maneuvers following the “wadding” will
> be scored Zero.
>
>
>
>
> Keith Hoard
> Collierville, TN
> khoard at gmail.com<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=khoard@gmail.com>
>
>
>
> *From:* Scott McHarg<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=scmcharg@gmail.com>
>
> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 9:25 PM
>
> *To:* General pattern discussion<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=nsrca-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
>
>
>
> Hi Dan,
>    It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would enjoy
> greatly as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have several filters
> in place so I'll just filter out the duplicate entries.  We will know who
> is trying to "pad the results".  There were several folks that were having
> trouble accessing the system so we had to remove the one time per user.
> Either way, only the initial entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just
> to screw it up for everyone, we'll just shut it down.  You're right, it
> makes it a bit useless when people do that.
>
> Have a good weekend,
> Scott
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=warrior523@att.net>>
> wrote:
>
> Guys,
>
>
>
> When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and submitted my
> answers.  Then I could not get back in to the survey.  Which I assume was
> to stop a person from voting more than once.  Well, I was on the website
> earlier tonight and for the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and
> behold I was back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit
> submit, I get the results sumitted message.  It appears that a person can
> vote as many times as they see fit now.  I had another person or two try
> the same thing with the same results.  Is this feature okay or is it making
> the survey results a bit useless?
>
>
>
> It may still be only countng the first time you voted or submitted but
> that is not the way it appears.  Anybody got an answer???
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Scott A. McHarg*
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<http://us.mc1616.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=NSRCA-discussion@lists.nsrca.org>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>

-- 
Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120220/fda55c37/attachment.html>