[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

[Keith Hoard]

You need to do a Google search, then.  

Keith Hoard
Collierville, TN
khoard at gmail.com 


From: Gordon Seeling 
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 9:41 AM
To: General pattern discussion 
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

On 2/18/2012 8:25 AM, Phil S. wrote: 
  Keith, I've smelled a LOT of money in my 75 years, and none of smelled like "wadded panties"...

  On 2/18/2012 9:48 AM, Keith Hoard wrote: 
    Hmmmm, maybe there is a market in the pattern community for Carbon Fiber panties. . . with 1/4” endgrain balsa reinforcements to prevent “wadding”? . . . 
    .
    I SMELL MONEY!!!!

    Keith Hoard
    Collierville, TN
    khoard at gmail.com 


    From: Phil S. 
    Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:15 AM
    To: General pattern discussion 
    Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

    I'll second that one, Keith, from one Volunteer to another...lol

    On 2/17/2012 11:52 PM, Keith Hoard wrote: 
      Geeze, now I have to come up with another rules proposal:

        A pattern competitor’s “panties” must be in the Full and Extended position from the time his aircraft enters the ready box, until the caller retrieves his airplane after an official flight.  If a competitors panties become “wadded” during a flight, the judges will immediately direct the pilot to land his airplane and all maneuvers following the “wadding” will be scored Zero.


      Keith Hoard
      Collierville, TN
      khoard at gmail.com 


      From: Scott McHarg 
      Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 9:25 PM
      To: General pattern discussion 
      Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

      Hi Dan,
         It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would enjoy greatly as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have several filters in place so I'll just filter out the duplicate entries.  We will know who is trying to "pad the results".  There were several folks that were having trouble accessing the system so we had to remove the one time per user.  Either way, only the initial entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just to screw it up for everyone, we'll just shut it down.  You're right, it makes it a bit useless when people do that.

      Have a good weekend,
      Scott


      On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net> wrote:

        Guys,

        When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and submitted my answers.  Then I could not get back in to the survey.  Which I assume was to stop a person from voting more than once.  Well, I was on the website earlier tonight and for the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and behold I was back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit submit, I get the results sumitted message.  It appears that a person can vote as many times as they see fit now.  I had another person or two try the same thing with the same results.  Is this feature okay or is it making the survey results a bit useless?

        It may still be only countng the first time you voted or submitted but that is not the way it appears.  Anybody got an answer???

        Dan

        _______________________________________________
        NSRCA-discussion mailing list
        NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
        http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion




      -- 
      Scott A. McHarg


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      _______________________________________________
      NSRCA-discussion mailing list
      NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
      http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-- 
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


-- 
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c
   

_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussionthe proper use of a arming plug would take care of this problem!!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120218/9f4b9632/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 1041 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120218/9f4b9632/attachment.png>