[NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey

[Gordon Seeling]

On 2/18/2012 8:25 AM, Phil S. wrote:
> Keith, I've smelled a LOT of money in my 75 years, and none of smelled 
> like "wadded panties"...
>
> On 2/18/2012 9:48 AM, Keith Hoard wrote:
>> Hmmmm, maybe there is a market in the pattern community for Carbon 
>> Fiber panties. . . with 1/4" endgrain balsa reinforcements to prevent 
>> "wadding"? . . .
>> .
>> I SMELL MONEY!!!!
>>
>> Keith Hoard
>> Collierville, TN
>> khoard at gmail.com
>> *From:* Phil S. <mailto:chuenkan at comcast.net>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, February 18, 2012 7:15 AM
>> *To:* General pattern discussion 
>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
>> I'll second that one, Keith, from one Volunteer to another...lol
>>
>> On 2/17/2012 11:52 PM, Keith Hoard wrote:
>>> Geeze, now I have to come up with another rules proposal:
>>>   A pattern competitor's "panties" must be in the Full and Extended 
>>> position from the time his aircraft enters the ready box, until the 
>>> caller retrieves his airplane after an official flight.  If a 
>>> competitors panties become "wadded" during a flight, the judges will 
>>> immediately direct the pilot to land his airplane and all maneuvers 
>>> following the "wadding" will be scored Zero.
>>>
>>> Keith Hoard
>>> Collierville, TN
>>> khoard at gmail.com
>>> *From:* Scott McHarg <mailto:scmcharg at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 17, 2012 9:25 PM
>>> *To:* General pattern discussion 
>>> <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Proposals Survey
>>> Hi Dan,
>>>    It just makes more work for me (which I'm sure Keith H. would 
>>> enjoy greatly as he seems to have his panties in a wad).  We have 
>>> several filters in place so I'll just filter out the duplicate 
>>> entries.  We will know who is trying to "pad the results".  There 
>>> were several folks that were having trouble accessing the system so 
>>> we had to remove the one time per user.  Either way, only the 
>>> initial entry will be taken and if a bunch go in just to screw it up 
>>> for everyone, we'll just shut it down.  You're right, it makes it a 
>>> bit useless when people do that.
>>>
>>> Have a good weekend,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Dan Curtis <warrior523 at att.net 
>>> <mailto:warrior523 at att.net>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Guys,
>>>     When the survey was put up on the website I filled it out and
>>>     submitted my answers.  Then I could not get back in to the
>>>     survey.  Which I assume was to stop a person from voting more
>>>     than once.  Well, I was on the website earlier tonight and for
>>>     the heck of it I hit the survey link and low and behold I was
>>>     back in and was able to fill the survey out again.  If I hit
>>>     submit, I get the results sumitted message.  It appears that a
>>>     person can vote as many times as they see fit now.  I had
>>>     another person or two try the same thing with the same results. 
>>>     Is this feature okay or is it making the survey results a bit
>>>     useless?
>>>     It may still be only countng the first time you voted or
>>>     submitted but that is not the way it appears.  Anybody got an
>>>     answer???
>>>     Dan
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>>     NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>>     <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>     http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> *Scott A. McHarg*
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Phil Spelt, KCRC President
>> AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
>> SPA 177 Board Member
>> (865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
>
> -- 
> Phil Spelt, KCRC President
> AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
> SPA 177 Board Member
> (865) 435-1476v, (865) 604-0541c
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
the proper use of a arming plug would take care of this problem!!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120218/5e125ba4/attachment.html>