[NSRCA-discussion] Retracts?
Robert Gainey
ruddercable at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 8 19:51:25 AKST 2012
It all depends on what wins and who is flying it ! Lets say for example, any one of the top ten pilots wins the world championships with a YS powered bi-plane equipped with retracts and counter rotating props. There's going to be a lot of used fixed gear electric powered monoplanes on the market !
--- On Sun, 12/9/12, Dave Harmon <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
From: Dave Harmon <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Retracts?
To: "'General pattern discussion'" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Sunday, December 9, 2012, 3:18 AM
I love em' both....
Dave Harmon
NSRCA 586
K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
Sperry, Ok.
-----Original Message-----
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of shinden1 at cox.net
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 8:54 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Retracts?
Well, there goes that excuse ! :)
Bryan
---- Ryan Smith <smaragdz at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 8, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Astropattern <astropattern at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Also because as the engines/motors evolved more power, the props got longer and the need for longer ground clearance was going beyond what single-wire retracts could handle.
> >
> > John
> >
> > Sent from my iPad
> >
> > On Dec 8, 2012, at 7:32 PM, "Dave Harmon" <k6xyz at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> ….and weight.
> >>
> >> Dave Harmon
> >> NSRCA 586
> >> K6XYZ[at]sbcglobal[dot]net
> >> Sperry, Ok.
> >>
> >> From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of PhilS.
> >> Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2012 7:10 PM
> >> To: Mark Aulfinger; General pattern discussion
> >> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Retracts?
> >>
> >> I think it has to do with the new style of flying -- slower, and especially trying to keep the down lines no faster than the horizontal lines. Dirty airframes provide more drag. Also, no retracts leads to less mechanical complexity, and one less point of failure. But, I think the drag thingy is the main point...
> >>
> >> Phil Spelt, KCRC President
> >> AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
> >> SPA 177 Board Member
> >> (865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
> >>
> >> On 12/8/2012 7:41 PM, Mark Aulfinger wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> Long time lurker on this message board. Wanted to ask why modern
> >> pattern planes don't have retracts? There's no doubt a good reason
> >> that no one uses them anymore. Just curious why...I like the looks of a plane with the gear tucked away.
> >>
> >> Thanks in advance for any replies,
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> >> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> >> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121209/d9bf7749/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list