[NSRCA-discussion] Going Electric - Battery Questions
Ed Alt
ed_alt at hotmail.com
Fri Dec 7 16:20:14 AKST 2012
Du-oh! Should have thought of that.
From: Keith Hoard
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 8:19 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Going Electric - Battery Questions
If you go with 40C batteries, just add a couple head shims to the ESC.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 7, 2012, at 19:04, Ed Alt <ed_alt at hotmail.com> wrote:
Assuming that you’re not discussing weighing the airplane for rules compliance, a higher nitro percentage for a given volume of glow fuel definitely does increase the weight of that volume of fuel, i.e., a heavier takeoff weight.
Ed
From: PhilS.
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 7:44 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Going Electric - Battery Questions
Sorry, Verne, more Nitro doesn't cost us more weight. ;-{)
Phil Spelt, KCRC President
AMA 1294 Scientific Leader Member
SPA 177 Board Member
(865)435-1476v, (865)604-0541c
On 12/7/2012 7:15 PM, Verne Koester wrote:
Larry, 20C is 10% nitro, 40C is 40% nitro. Like nitro, more C is more weight as well in most cases.
I fly Masters with 20C batteries and have my throttle governed back to make it easier to manage the excess power. I started last season with 25C batteries and had to govern it back even more. Using 40C batteries would be like sticking a YS 170 on a 110-size plane while probably putting you over the weight limit.
Verne
From: nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org] On Behalf Of Larry Diamond
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2012 6:18 PM
To: General pattern discussion
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Going Electric - Battery Questions
Interesting point... I don't understand how changing from 20C to 40C pack makes a difference using the same Motor and ESC combo. If it's battery heat, my electronics background would tell me the pack is probably being dicharged too deep. Not good for the life of a battery.
I suspect the result of not changing the Motor/ESC and only changing the battery will reult in a shorter battery life; and, over loading the power plant which will probably result in damaging the ESC and/or the Motor.
I could be wrong, cause I really have no experience with electric power set ups in planes. I just don't understand the logic going from 20C to 40C and the result being "too hot for intermediate".
It wouldn't surprise me to see Masters or FAI having a higher power set up, like 3,500 to 4,000+ watts. Then depending on the max current draw, 40C may make sense.
My set up will be about 2,700 to 3,000 watts based on specs... It may not be sufficient for Masters or FAI.
Perhaps this will turn out to be a good constructive discussion for a number of people like me, but I'm curious as to other opinions who have practicle knowledge.
Larry Diamond
From: Patrick Harris <harris7148 at gmail.com>
To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Sent: Friday, December 7, 2012 2:02 PM
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Going Electric - Battery Questions
Larry,
You have received all good advice. One thing to keep in mind, is you are not going to be able to fly two full sequences with pretty much any setup. With the Himax in a Monolog flying Intermediate, 20C's are going to be perfect. With 20C's and good throttle management you are going to be able to fly the full Intermediate and maybe four or five more maneuvers. If you go up to 40C, you will find the Himax way to hot for Intermediate, and you won't add that much flying time.
Another thing about the Himax is it really needs an aggressive throttle curve on the bottom. If you just fly it out of the box it will have zip for low end and nuts for high end all at about mid throttle. On the low end, you will just keep pushing and pushing and nothing seems to happen until you hit mid throttle and it will go nuts. The best throttle curve on my Himax looks like a snake. It ramps up really fast on the low end, tappers off at mid throttle and then heads back up on the high end, but you need to work it out for your set up. Trust me, spending a good amount of time getting this right is going to pay big dividends. If you don't, your uplines are going to be way too hot.
Hey Larry,
As everyone is telling you, the BIG difference between what you're proposing and what you're accustomed to with Glg to below is that you'll fly 90% of your sequence at half throttle. Not figuratively half throttle... but literally half, or below. Even a vertical upline does not need full motor on these setups. Flying intermediate even less so. Also, at full throttle you'll likely only pull about 75amps, so even 15C batteries would get the job done, but I would stick with 20 and higher.
Mark Atwood
Paragon Consulting, Inc. | President
5885 Landerbrook Drive Suite 130, Cleveland Ohio, 44124
Phone: 440.684.3101 x102 | Fax: 440.684.3102
mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com<mailto:mark.atwood at paragon-inc.com> | http://www.paragon-inc.com/<http://www.paragon-inc.com/>
On Dec 7, 2012, at 1:37 PM, Larry Diamond wrote:
OK, play nice... Never dealt with electrics before... I could be way off base, but here is a stab at it...
Is my math flawed?
Motor - Himax 6330-210 F3A Motor (210KV)
ESC - Phoenix Ice 80HV - New V2 Version
Battery 10s - 37VDC
Plane - 2M Monolog
Max power range is about ~2,700 to ~3,000 watts with this set up...
Calculated Battery Discharge Rate = 80Amps (ESC rating) divided by 3,500mAh (battery capacity) = 22.9C
Based on this math I suspect that a 30C dicharge rate is good on paper... additional discharge performane = $$$ and I don't want to spend money on battery performance I don't need...
Class - Intermediate
What is the recommended battery capacity and discharge rate...?
I understand the many variables associated with the answer like, prop size, temps, wind, throttle control, yada, yada, yada...
I would like to fly the Intermediate sequence a couple time without having to refuel electrons...
Larry Diamond
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org<mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20121208/2ebc41db/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list