[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposals

[richard wallace]

Leaving an interpretation like this to CD discretion is a horrible copout,
and is totally inappropriate.
I'd there's going to be a rule it must be understandable on its own,
without the need for CD intervention.
If a rule can't do that then it probly shouldn't be a rule...
 On Apr 22, 2012 9:03 PM, "J N Hiller" <jnhiller at earthlink.net> wrote:

>  The last sentence of the proposed replacement paragraph helps control
> the use of telemetry.****
>
> ** ******
>
> "The final determination of whether or not the use of telemetry
> information constitutes an unfair advantage is left to the discretion of
> the CD."****
>
> ** ******
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org [mailto:
> nsrca-discussion-bounces at lists.nsrca.org]*On Behalf Of *Jon Lowe
> *Sent:* Sunday, April 22, 2012 7:03 PM
> *To:* nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> *Subject:* Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposals
>
> ** ******
>
> Where a lot of us were, voting against it.****
>
> Jon****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Gayer <jgghome at comcast.net>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sun, Apr 22, 2012 8:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposals****
>
> You are all correct in that the word "engine" was used inappropriately and
> we should have used "powerplant".
> Where were all you guys when we published and surveyed on this proposal
> PRIOR to  submitting to the CB???
>
>
> On 4/22/2012 2:41 PM, James Oddino wrote: ****
>
> Who wrote the words and what was their intention?  I guarantee it doesn't
> do what they intended because it doesn't apply to electric powered aircraft
> that don't have engines. ****
>
> ** ******
>
> I would interpret it to mean something like control line engines that
> automatically change mixture setting from horizontal to vertical flight.**
> **
>
> ** ******
>
> I've said it before.  We don't need more rules and regulations, we need
> fewer.  ****
>
> ** ******
>
> Jim****
>
> ** ******
>
> ** ******
>
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Peter Vogel wrote:****
>
>
> **
> ******
>
> Quick question on the "functions not allowed" section of RCA13-4-McHarg: *
> ***
>
> ** ******
>
> 9. Engine management systems that coordinate power output with model
> performance, position, or ****
>
> attitude.”****
>
> ** ******
>
> Does that make systems such as the Hacker Senestrol system which ensures a
> consistent RPM based on throttle position illegal?  I know they were
> specifically designed for F3A use in Europe and have been popular...****
>
> ** ******
>
> Peter+****
>
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:18 AM, J N Hiller <jnhiller at earthlink.net>
> wrote:****
>
> Attached is a summery of the RC Aerobatics rules change proposals for the
> 2013-14 cycle. I put this together for a presentation at our judging
> seminar
> yesterday.
>
> The actual proposals can be viewed at
> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx
> The initial vote ballots are due at AMA headquarters May 1 2012.
> Contact your AMA district contest board representative with your concerns
> and preferences regarding these proposed changes immediately as time is
> short. Here is a link to the contest board members.
> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/cbmembers.aspx
>
> I pause before sending this fearing I may not have it all correct. If I'm
> in
> error just delete it and accept my apology.
> Jim Hiller
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
>
>
> ****
>
> ** ******
>
> -- ****
>
> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training****
>
> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark****
>
> ****
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
> ** ******
>
>
> **
> ******
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list****
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org****
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
>
> _______________________________________________****
>
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list****
>
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org****
>
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion****
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120423/dbc78452/attachment.html>