[NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposals

[Whodaddy Whodaddy]

:)..

Now when my last YS was running I had wires and hoses
Going to the prop turner... All in fun .. Lol


G

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com> wrote:

> Where a lot of us were, voting against it.
> Jon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Gayer <jgghome at comcast.net>
> To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Sent: Sun, Apr 22, 2012 8:50 pm
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Rules change proposals
> 
> You are all correct in that the word "engine" was used inappropriately and we should have used "powerplant".
> Where were all you guys when we published and surveyed on this proposal PRIOR to  submitting to the CB???
> 
> 
> On 4/22/2012 2:41 PM, James Oddino wrote:
>> 
>> Who wrote the words and what was their intention?  I guarantee it doesn't do what they intended because it doesn't apply to electric powered aircraft that don't have engines.
>> 
>> I would interpret it to mean something like control line engines that automatically change mixture setting from horizontal to vertical flight.
>> 
>> I've said it before.  We don't need more rules and regulations, we need fewer.  
>> 
>> Jim
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Peter Vogel wrote:
>> 
>>> Quick question on the "functions not allowed" section of RCA13-4-McHarg:
>>> 
>>> 9. Engine management systems that coordinate power output with model performance, position, or 
>>> attitude.”
>>> 
>>> Does that make systems such as the Hacker Senestrol system which ensures a consistent RPM based on throttle position illegal?  I know they were specifically designed for F3A use in Europe and have been popular...
>>> 
>>> Peter+
>>> On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 9:18 AM, J N Hiller <jnhiller at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> Attached is a summery of the RC Aerobatics rules change proposals for the
>>> 2013-14 cycle. I put this together for a presentation at our judging seminar
>>> yesterday.
>>> 
>>> The actual proposals can be viewed at
>>> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/ruleproposals/rcaerobatics.aspx
>>> The initial vote ballots are due at AMA headquarters May 1 2012.
>>> Contact your AMA district contest board representative with your concerns
>>> and preferences regarding these proposed changes immediately as time is
>>> short. Here is a link to the contest board members.
>>> http://www.modelaircraft.org/events/cbmembers.aspx
>>> 
>>> I pause before sending this fearing I may not have it all correct. If I'm in
>>> error just delete it and accept my apology.
>>> Jim Hiller
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Director, Fixed Wing Flight Training
>>> Santa Clara County Model Aircraft Skypark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20120423/b6ec745a/attachment.html>