[NSRCA-discussion] Be Vigilant

Archie Stafford astafford at md.metrocast.net
Thu Sep 29 14:38:35 AKDT 2011


You really think if the AMA had contacted them immediately that it would get
on TV???  I¹d be stunned if the media didn¹t know about it first.

Arch


On 9/29/11 6:35 PM, "Anthony Cornacchione" <acornacchione at hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Unfortunate indeed. Despite press releases, I believe all that people will
> remember a week from now is that the FBI caught a guy who was going to use an
> RC plane to blow stuff up. I think the AMA could've done better preventing the
> misinformation that's out there now by contacting the media yesterday, and
> making statement and answering questions last night via the affiliate stations
> (ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC) in Indianapolis.  I'll be watching tonight to see if
> the AMA's statement today is even mentioned once they get through reporting on
> Michael Jackson, tainted fruit, and the collapse of the RedSox.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:44 PM, "Wayne Galligan" <wcgalligan at att.net> wrote:
> 
>> We were talking about the very same thing as the news was on.  The media
>> grabs for the sensational but wont focus on whether or not the models are
>> capable of carrying any kind of payload they where talking about.  If those
>> jets are turbines then they would be severely limit by the amount of fuel
>> they carry and any additional payload(explosives,gps, etc.)
>>  
>> Wayne Galligan
>> 
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>  
>>> From:  Lightfoot <mailto:lightfoot at sc.rr.com>
>>>  
>>> To: 'General pattern  discussion' <mailto:nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>>  
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:51  PM
>>>  
>>> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Be  Vigilant
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> All for $200?! Someone needs to research the source of the  model, payload
>>> (of any RC model), flying range, etc. The news reports did our  hobby a big
>>> disservice with their sloppy reporting!
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Jay  Marshall  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> NSRCA-discussion  mailing list
>>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org <mailto:NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
>>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>>> <http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion>
>> _______________________________________________
>> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
>> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
>> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110929/dcf43b96/attachment.html>


More information about the NSRCA-discussion mailing list