[NSRCA-discussion] Be Vigilant
Anthony Cornacchione
acornacchione at hotmail.com
Thu Sep 29 14:35:33 AKDT 2011
Unfortunate indeed. Despite press releases, I believe all that people will remember a week from now is that the FBI caught a guy who was going to use an RC plane to blow stuff up. I think the AMA could've done better preventing the misinformation that's out there now by contacting the media yesterday, and making statement and answering questions last night via the affiliate stations (ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC) in Indianapolis. I'll be watching tonight to see if the AMA's statement today is even mentioned once they get through reporting on Michael Jackson, tainted fruit, and the collapse of the RedSox.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:44 PM, "Wayne Galligan" <wcgalligan at att.net> wrote:
> We were talking about the very same thing as the news was on. The media grabs for the sensational but wont focus on whether or not the models are capable of carrying any kind of payload they where talking about. If those jets are turbines then they would be severely limit by the amount of fuel they carry and any additional payload(explosives,gps, etc.)
>
> Wayne Galligan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Lightfoot
> To: 'General pattern discussion'
> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Be Vigilant
>
> All for $200?! Someone needs to research the source of the model, payload (of any RC model), flying range, etc. The news reports did our hobby a big disservice with their sloppy reporting!
>
>
>
> Jay Marshall
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110929/6550b251/attachment.html>
More information about the NSRCA-discussion
mailing list