[NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team

[Ronald Van Putte]

I keep wondering who in the U.S. should have been "minding the store"  
on this subject.  If other countries picked up on adding a junior  
member on their team, why didn't we?

Ron

On May 29, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Bob Richards wrote:

> Then I guess the only alternative is to send no junior? Seems to me  
> that if we get a quick consensus to use the Nats results, it should  
> all be good.
>
> JMHO,
>
> Bob R.
>
>
> --- On Fri, 5/27/11, Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team
> To: "NSRCA Discussion List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
> Date: Friday, May 27, 2011, 10:38 PM
>
> I believe none particitated in the team selection process?
>
> Picking someone based on anything else would open a can of worms.
>
> > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:11:51 -0600
> > From: jgghome at comcast.net
> > To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team
> >
> > Looking at the AMA site for the Worlds, I notice that several  
> teams have
> > added a fourth junior member to their teams as per the new rules.
> > It is rather disappointing to me at least that we, as the host  
> nation,
> > have not given any of our juniors(under 18) a chance to compete  
> at the
> > world level against other international juniors.
> >
> > John Gayer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> > NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> > http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110530/58685154/attachment.html>