[NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team

[Bob Richards]

Then I guess the only alternative is to send no junior? Seems to me that if we get a quick consensus to use the Nats results, it should all be good.
 
JMHO,
 
Bob R.


--- On Fri, 5/27/11, Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com> wrote:


From: Joe Lachowski <jlachow at hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team
To: "NSRCA Discussion List" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
Date: Friday, May 27, 2011, 10:38 PM




I believe none particitated in the team selection process? 
 
Picking someone based on anything else would open a can of worms.
 
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:11:51 -0600
> From: jgghome at comcast.net
> To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> Subject: [NSRCA-discussion] Junior Members for World Team
> 
> Looking at the AMA site for the Worlds, I notice that several teams have 
> added a fourth junior member to their teams as per the new rules.
> It is rather disappointing to me at least that we, as the host nation, 
> have not given any of our juniors(under 18) a chance to compete at the 
> world level against other international juniors.
> 
> John Gayer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NSRCA-discussion mailing list
> NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
> http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

-----Inline Attachment Follows-----


_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110530/a1245f7c/attachment.html>