[NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on theNSRCA website

[Del]

I know a few over the years have left because of the top driving forces being catered to. 
 
    Del
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: mike mueller 
  To: General pattern discussion 
  Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 10:50 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on theNSRCA website


   I will say this and I will not say anything more. A large amount of masters flyers asked for this change. I'm absolutely sure of this. That's why Rusty made the change. Changing it back now is going to upset a lot of people and look like a power play from the top of the food chain. The sentiment among a lot of the masters flyers is that they are treated as second class citizens at the nats. That's a statment I'll stand behind because thats exactly how I've heard it.Lets not forget that the masters class has the most fliers in it and it's important that their wishes are accommodated once in a while. I'm not the one saying it but I sure as heck can tell you that its a strong sentiment.
   Personally I'm just happy to get the week off and see my friends and maybe just maybe impress a few with some form of talent and preparation. If its changed back I promise I'm not going to say a word. I however can not vouch for my friends I can almost say for sure that they will not be so kind.
   This is not a huge deal. It's been done for many years successfully. Its a minor inconvenience.
   So for the sake of peace and understanding I'm asking you all to go with it and don't fight this too much this year.
  I'm looking forward to some changes and I hope it leaves everyone happy. This may take some sacrifice from some but were all in this together and we need to get along. The nats needs to be a showcase of what pattern represents. Good people who share a common passion for a pretty obscure activity.
   Thanks, Mike Mueller


  From: Jon Lowe <jonlowe at aol.com>
  To: nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 7:56 AM
  Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website

  Frankly, I like the idea of Masters finishing earlier in the day for a change.  If we run long, they will have to wait.  And we are talking about 8 people for the unknown meeting, correct?  This isn't a team selection year so there is no need to expand the number of finalists.

  Jon



  -----Original Message-----From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>To: General pattern discussion <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>Sent: Thu, Jul 21, 2011 7:47 amSubject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website 
  Nope. 


  Ron
  On Jul 21, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Tim Taylor wrote:
          No reason it can't be changed is there?

          Tim--- On Wed, 7/20/11, Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net> wrote:

            From: Ronald Van Putte <vanputte at cox.net>
            Subject: Re: [NSRCA-discussion] The NATS schedule has been published on the NSRCA website
            To: "General pattern discussion" <nsrca-discussion at lists.nsrca.org>
            Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 7:58 PM


            Based on the Master class entry list and the fact that the Master class is flying in the morning, we should use up virtually every minute from 8:00 A.M. to noon, assuming 10 minutes per flight and very short judge potty breaks.  I hope there's no rain delays. 
            Ron Van Putte
            On Jul 20, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Derek Koopowitz wrote:
              Thanks to Rusty for sending me the information.  Some locations/times may change for the judging certification... stay tuned! 
              http://www.nsrca.us
              _______________________________________________
              NSRCA-discussion mailing list
              NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
              http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion

            -----Inline Attachment Follows-----


            _______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion 

    _______________________________________________
    NSRCA-discussion mailing list
    NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
    http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
  = 
_______________________________________________
NSRCA-discussion mailing list
NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
_______________________________________________NSRCA-discussion mailing listNSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.orghttp://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  NSRCA-discussion mailing list
  NSRCA-discussion at lists.nsrca.org
  http://lists.nsrca.org/mailman/listinfo/nsrca-discussion
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nsrca.org/pipermail/nsrca-discussion/attachments/20110721/9c69d887/attachment.html>